Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sun, Jul 22, 2012 at 8:08 PM, Zach Beane <x...@xach.com> wrote: > > I can appreciate the desire for Lisp systems to have some form of > Quicklisp integration, but I am reluctant to see divergence of > instructions like this. I really like that the instructions for everyone > are the same, instead of "On ECL, use (require :ecl-quicklisp), > otherwise on XYCL, use (require :xy-quicklisp), otherwise download and > load this file..." Same with instructions for loading things. "If you're > on ECL, use REQUIRE, otherwise use QL:QUICKLOAD, otherwise..." > > Your instructions really do not change, they continue to work so what is the > problem?
People will blog about how they used (require :ecl-quicklisp) in ecl, newbies will complain that it doesn't work (on their implementation), then may blog about the social problems of #lisp or cll… -- __Pascal Bourguignon__ http://www.informatimago.com/ A bad day in () is better than a good day in {}. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Live Security Virtual Conference Exclusive live event will cover all the ways today's security and threat landscape has changed and how IT managers can respond. Discussions will include endpoint security, mobile security and the latest in malware threats. http://www.accelacomm.com/jaw/sfrnl04242012/114/50122263/ _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
