On Wed, 14 Nov 2012 20:27:13 +0100 Juan Jose Garcia-Ripoll <juanjose.garciarip...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 14, 2012 at 2:42 AM, Matthew Mondor > <mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net>wrote: > > > I forgot to write about another alternative using bytecode though... if > > all code compiles to bytecode only, and the bytecode interpreter > > permits to impose all the limits you need > > > > The problem is not the bytecodes, but the libraries. Common Lisp contains > lots of functions that allocate memory. Of course, one could do a very > invasive auditing of ECL and log all those operations, but this is a > nontrivial change -- I doubt this approach is used elsewhere: doesn't > Google Chrome actually devote one process for each page, thus isolating > them perfectly? At least according to a paper I read about it when it came out, it does use one process per tab. -- Matt ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Monitor your physical, virtual and cloud infrastructure from a single web console. Get in-depth insight into apps, servers, databases, vmware, SAP, cloud infrastructure, etc. Download 30-day Free Trial. Pricing starts from $795 for 25 servers or applications! http://p.sf.net/sfu/zoho_dev2dev_nov _______________________________________________ Ecls-list mailing list Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
