On Mon, Jun 24, 2013 at 4:29 PM, Matthew Mondor <mm_li...@pulsar-zone.net>wrote:
> There's also a peculiarity however: the condition type will be
> presented as SIMPLE-FILE-ERROR in these new implementations which
> doesn't actually exist in the condition system, but it's actually
> FILE-ERROR, with SIMPLE- prefixed. I forgot the exact reason for this,
> but Juanjo once explained it to me and I could search my archives if
> necessary.
>
Simple errors carry an explanatory message, file errors do not; for this
reason most errors signaled by ECL are mixins of simple-error and some more
fundamental class.
In principle the fact that the condition is signaled as a descendent of
file-error and not a file-error instance should not be a problem, provided
the user does not assume unspecified behavior.
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
