On Sun, Jul 7, 2013 at 6:18 PM, Peter Enerccio <enerc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I dont understand why do you need to provide your binary o file with LGPL
> at all. What is the merit of it, from the point of creator of library?
The merit is allowing users to fix software provided they have the
libraries it depends on. This was not possible not too long ago, and it is
still not possible for a lot of software out there. Being able to re-link
the software with patched libraries might have seemed a nice solution back
then, when people were more used to hacking their own problems.
Juanjo
--
Instituto de Física Fundamental, CSIC
c/ Serrano, 113b, Madrid 28006 (Spain)
http://juanjose.garciaripoll.googlepages.com
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by Windows:
Build for Windows Store.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/windows-dev2dev
_______________________________________________
Ecls-list mailing list
Ecls-list@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecls-list
