> On 28 Nov, 2023, at 2:57 pm, Pete Heist via Ecn-sane > <[email protected]> wrote: > > This isn't a problem with BBR. The problem is, we've started an > experiment [RFC9331] that redefines the meaning of CE in a way that's > incompatible with existing RFC3168 middleboxes. This feature in BBR is > just a reflection of that. CCA developers are now tasked with somehow > deciding which type of CE they're seeing. > > Speaking of ecn "sane", does anyone else see this as not? :) and as a > problem that needs solving?
Count me in the "not sane" camp, at least. This is exactly the kind of ambiguity that SCE is designed to avoid. - Jonathan Morton _______________________________________________ Ecn-sane mailing list [email protected] https://lists.bufferbloat.net/listinfo/ecn-sane
