3.3. Christianity

Religions represent some of the most powerful and elaborate meme 
complexes in existence today; they have evolved
over millennia into countless variants and co- evolved with cultures. 
Making a complete memetic analysis of even a
single religion is beyond the scope of this paper, so by necessity 
the following discussion will be rather general. 

Religions tend to consist of some basic core memes (in the case of 
Christianity the belief in God and salvation through
Christ) surrounded by symbiotic doctrinary memes (how salvation 
can be reached, ethical systems, the cosmology) and
then an immense cloud of related memes (religious stories, 
doctrines, interpretations). These memes form a symbiotic
whole; the core memes need symbiotic memes to provide hooks and 
baits, and the symbiotic memes reinforce each other
and are given legitimacy by the core memes. 

3.3.1. Properties of the Meme

The Christianity meme complex has throughout history been 
transmitted in a multitude of forms: as oral stories, through
books and art, through example and through upbringing. Due to its 
complexity the transmission takes time and is closely
linked to cultural understanding. This either requires a relatively 
concentrated effort to transmit the complex (mission) or
to spread it by cultural diffusion and imitation (upbringing). A 
frequent diffusion situation is when a child is brought up in
a Christian home. The Christian meme complex is presented as the 
truth about how the world functions. Variants of the
meme have increased their fitness by encouraging a high rate of 
reproduction and cultural transmission (Lynch 1996). 

Most major religions rely on active transmission: one or more hosts 
actively supports the spread of the meme, often in an
interactive and deliberate way. Efficient methods for mission have 
co-evolved with the religion and the situation; the best
missionaries gained the most converts, among which were the next 
generation of missionaries (and missionary teachers)
who would learn and spread some of their best methods. 

Classically, Christianity have used the bait of salvation (freedom 
from fear, personal happiness and prosperity, spiritual
fulfilment, eternal life or union with God have all been promoted at 
various time) combined with the threat of damnation
to promote interest and infection. This is however just the explicit 
bait, it appears likely that many Christian movements
have been spread by implicit factors such as a sense of belonging, 
social conformity and a consistent world-view. It is
worth noting that the baits and threats are mostly based on the 
symbiotic memes and not the core memes of the complex,
which means their relative prevalence can change to fit the situation 
(for example the ratio of hellfire threats to salvation
baits used in sermons) or they can evolve while leaving the core 
memes unchanged. 

Religions are often better than other meme complexes (such as 
science) at explaining how the world works on an
emotional level. They provide answers to existential questions that 
are emotionally appealing, creating a satisfying world
model (which then becomes intellectually satisfying regardless of its 
consistency due to cognitive dissonance). Because
religions seldom try to empirically prove themselves they cannot be 
disproved, which further aids their stability. A
religion can spread regardless of the truth or falsity of its claims. 

The Christianity meme contains an entire world-view, and seeks to 
cause an accommodation in the schemata of the
infected host; no other memes are allowed to influence high-level 
planning and behaviour ("Ye cannot serve God and
Mammon", Matthew 24). This is achieved by rejecting such memes 
or impulses as 'against God's will', 'sinful' or
'satanic'. 

Like all the other major world religions, Christianity has a strong 
mission. It both exists as an explicit missionary order
and in the form of an implicit altruistic hook (see the section about 
hooks and motivation). Christians are urged to set
good examples to others, which also increases the likelihood of 
transmission through social learning. 

Reply via email to