> Evelyn-
> 
> There is nothing biological about humyn consumption of flesh.  Our
> digestive systems were not designed for it.  It is the meat industry that
> perpetuates that notion.  THey tell us that animal foods are healthy and
> natural for us, when in fact, they are killing us (and other animals).  I
> agree that some animals are carnivorous.  Cats, for example.  But humyns
> are not.
> 
> Even if we were, the arguement that they are there for our consumption is
> really anthropocentic.  They are no more on this Earth for our consumption
> than we are for theirs.  What makes you act like humyns are superior, or
> stewards or anything else. Maybe instead of taking biology classes to
> learn to manipulate this planet and the creatures on it, you should
> recognize the humyn-centered mentality that "biological science"
> perpetuates and let nature take her course.
> 
> BTW, if eating animals is nature, then be natural and go out and kill them
> yourself.  Industrialism and factory farming are certaingly not natural,
> and unjustifyable from a biological viewpoint.
> 
> ----------
> From:         Evelyn Kaldoja[SMTP:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Reply To:     [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent:         Tuesday, March 23, 1999 2:58 AM
> To:   STUDIES IN WOMEN AND ENVIRONMENT
> Subject:      Re: Meat
> 
> On Mon, 22 Mar 1999, sarah clifton wrote:
> 
> > You know, this sound all too familiar.  "Blacks should be slaves because
> > they are a lesser species."  "Women should serve their men, because eve
> was
> > made from adam.", etc, etc, etc.  
> > 
> > Does it bother you that you are perpetuating specisism by acting with no
> > concern whatsoever for other (non-humyn) animals?
> >
> OK, let's imagine that you were right... Then it might be right to force
> tigers and wolves to eat grass and vegetables too? I don't know what
> programs have American schools in Chemistry, Biology and Environment
> studies, but I have been tought that some animals need to get animal
> proteins and human is one of those animals. 
> Also, those meat-eating animals are actually doing good to those whom
> they're eating -- by killing the weaker ones they don't let their
> population grow too big and also, help the evolution process to take
> place. 
> Biology is not a society study where everything depends on
> researcher's sex, race, subculture, age ...  I consider myself part of the
> nature and so I prefer eating meat and raw vegetables to E-chemistry that
> comes with the western plastic culture. But in America things are probably
> different and people have estranged from the nature more than we here
> (that might even be one of the good things that comes with being a
> post-communist state).
> For me both extremes -- total vegetarianism and
> total hamburgerianism (if I may use such expression) -- seem quite
> unnatural.
> 
> 

Reply via email to