Does it
>make sense to say sex/gender is linked to physical violence but not to
>physical bravery?  Does even considering a linkage in the first case do
>an injustice to the men who do not support such violence?  How does one
>target the patriarchal way of thinking, remain compassionate to men who
>do embody it, and help them to get over it?
>
>
>Ronnie

I must respond to this.  If I read you correctly you are saying that
violence and bravery are both gender linked and  to men.  Whilst I agree
that most physical violence is perpetuated by men, I cannot agree that men
are braver than women.  Women have had to be more brave in order to stand
up to the oppression of men and this bravery is largely not acknowledged.
Unlike acts of bravery performed by men which are celebrated.  For example
many women worked onthe front lines in the second world war (nursing) and
many died.  But up till recently they were not even acknowledged and in
Australia service women or any women were not allowed to march in the Anzac
march.
Women have had to be brave in many aspects of their lives that men do not
have to be.

I do not mean to denigrate the brave acts of men in the green movement but
women are also involved and have chained themselves to American Warships
(Valentine in Perth - later to become the First Green Senator for Aust.)

In response to the seal article and the points you raise about other
issues.  I think it is interesting that the seals are used for their penis
and that this is for some impotency drink.  The very need to kill the seals
can be clearly linked to male domination here.  Penis worshipping is
something men do regardless that they may believe women do - not many do.
Impotence is mainly caused by performance anxiety.  If men did not believe
themselves superior but had an equal partnership with their partner they
may be more concerned with their partners pleasure than with their own
performance.  The anxiety about performance is rarely linked to a concern
for the partners orgasm.

When looking at a different culture we have to very careful not to justify
gender and class and other structural issues out of respect for the
culture.  A culture is more than sexism and homophobia, after all these
things could be said to be almost universal - they are where I come from.
It would be racist to judge the entire pop of the sealers by the acts of
those macho men, just as it would be unjust to judge me because the
Australian federal govt is letting woodchippers devastate virgin forest at
such an incredible rate that I can't even keep up to date.

In order to tackle issues such as the seal killing problem we need to
address the structures that support and encourage this activity.  This
appears to be a mammoth, even impossible task.  But I continue wherever I
can to attempt to educate people about the basic equality of all people and
the need for social justice and a green agenda.  I vote green and give my
time to the green movement at election time.  I explain to as many people
as possible the way the preferential voting system works so they can have a
real choice(as real as the candidates offer).

Ronnie, I guess this may not be the sort of response you're asking for but
it's a start! :)

Respectfully
Kylie

[EMAIL PROTECTED]

  "Interesting:  Your people glorified organised violence for 40 centuries,
but you imprison those who employ it privately."
 Mr Spock. Star Trek 'Dagger of the Mind'

Reply via email to