The story is even more complex than that, I think, in that some of the =
criticisms of Kettlewell's original experiments are legitimate.  No =
reason to throw the baby out with the bathwater, though, and more =
recent, more robust experiments have upheld Kettlewell's findings, =
thought his methods were flawed.
=20
I use this story as an example of how science is done in my ecology =
class.  Someone publishes something, people accept it, but years later, =
problems are discovered, and people repeat experiments to fine-tune the =
knowledge.  It doesn't mean the original science was necessarily wrong, =
but that our methods have improved and there are better ways of testing =
the hypothesis.  I think teaching students how to evaluate whether a =
website is credible can also be an important lesson.  Far better if they =
can learn to debunk these websites on their own that for us to tell them =
it's wrong.
=20
I highly recommend Bruce S. Grant's paper, "Fine Tuning the Peppered =
Moth Paradigm" as a teaching tool and discussion of this problem.
=20
Grant, Bruce S.  1999.  Fine Tuning the Peppered Moth Paradigm.  =
Evolution 53 (3) 980-984.

________________________________

From: Ecological Society of America: grants, jobs, news on behalf of =
Leslie Mertz
Sent: Fri 9/1/2006 9:07 AM
To: ECOLOG-L@LISTSERV.UMD.EDU
Subject: Google and peppered moths



Something is wrong here. When I typed "peppered moths" into Google,=20
up popped a listing of pages claiming to expose the famed study as=20
faulty science. Anyone with an understanding of natural selection and=20
evolution can quickly see through the pages' creationist=20
underpinnings and find the myriad mistakes in their claims. To the=20
many people who are still forming opinions about the topics, however,=20
the sheer number of these web pages -- even though they are mainly=20
repeats of the same purposely erroneous information -- may lead them=20
to the wrong conclusion. This includes college students, who will=20
"google" just about anything and everything. Perhaps we need to use=20
the same tactics to ensure that the scientifically accurate story is=20
told.

=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D=3D
Leslie Mertz, Ph.D.
educator
Wayne State University

Reply via email to