Dear Suzanne and interested others,

The latest best practice I've run across is the 
Wilson method using Yates' continuity 
correction.  It is formally described and advocated in the following articles:

Newcombe R.G. (1998) Two-Sided Confidence 
Intervals for the Single Proportion: Comparison 
of Seven Methods. Statistics in Medicine 17, 857–872.

Newcombe R.G. (1998) Interval Estimation for the 
Difference Between Independent Proportions: 
Comparison of Eleven Methods. Statistics in Medicine 17, 873–890.

If you use the stats language R, it's implemented 
using prop.test (which also allows two-sample 
testing of equal proportions).  There's also a 
web interface at: http://faculty.vassar.edu/lowry/prop1.html

Good luck,
Phil

At 10:37 PM 12/16/2007, Suzanne Griffin wrote:
>Can anyone tell me how to compute CI's for a 
>proportion when the sample is fron from a finite 
>population? For example,?the population size is 
>100, I sample 50 individuals, and the event of 
>interest occurs in 20 cases. I want to put 
>confidence intervals around that 0.40.
>
>I would appreciate any guidance.
>
>Sue
>
>Suzanne Griffin
>Wildlife Biology Program
>College of Forestry and Conservation
>University of Montana
>Missoula, MT 59812
>

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
   Phil 
Novack-Gottshall 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]

   Assistant Professor
   Department of Geosciences
   University of West Georgia
   Carrollton, GA 30118-3100
   Phone: 678-839-4061
   Fax: 678-839-4071
   http://www.westga.edu/~pnovackg
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Reply via email to