Recent joint editorial from all herp societies published in Herpetological Conservation and Biology.
The "peer" in Peer Review. http://www.herpconbio.org/Volume_6/Issue_3/Joint_editorial_2011.pdf On Thu, Jan 5, 2012 at 4:02 PM, Chris Lortie <lor...@yorku.ca> wrote: > Dear Ecologgers, > > Thank you so much for your feedback on the editorial 'Money for nothing and > referees for free' > published in Ideas in Ecology and Evolution in December > (http://library.queensu.ca/ojs/index.php/IEE/index). The most compelling and > common question > I was asked was is there a referee crisis in ecology (or tragedy of the > 'reviewers common' as > Hochberg et al. proposed). This is an excellent question. I propose that > whilst there are more > perfect ways to test this (total up number of submissions and then estimate > total pool of referees, > tricky), an interesting indicator would instead to be calculate the decline > to review rate (d2rr) in > ecology. I envision the following two primary data streams to calculate > this rate: a per capita > estimate derived from each of us personally and a mean estimate of rate from > the publishing > portals (journals). Hence, let's do it. Only you know your decline to > (accept doing a) review rate > across all requests whilst journals track their own net rates and your > specific rate with them too. > > So, please take 30 seconds and fill in this short survey, and we can then > assess, to an extent, > whether there is a referee crisis in ecology. > > https://www.surveymonkey.com/s/VD3K36W > > I have also compiled a long list of emails for every editor I could find for > all ecology journals and > have contacted them to see if they would share the rate at which individuals > decline for each of > them, i.e. do they have to ask 5 or 6 people to even secure two reviews? I > will not share the journal > names etc. and protect their rates as I recognize the implications. I would > just like to know what > our overall mean is from a journal perspective too. > > Thanks so much for your time and help with these discussions. I hope you > think they are > important too, but I also want to assure you that this is my penultimate post > on the subject. > Warm regards, > Christopher Lortie. > lor...@yorku.ca > www.onepoint.ca -- Malcolm L. McCallum Department of Molecular Biology and Biochemistry School of Biological Sciences University of Missouri at Kansas City Managing Editor, Herpetological Conservation and Biology "Peer pressure is designed to contain anyone with a sense of drive" - Allan Nation 1880's: "There's lots of good fish in the sea" W.S. Gilbert 1990's: Many fish stocks depleted due to overfishing, habitat loss, and pollution. 2000: Marine reserves, ecosystem restoration, and pollution reduction MAY help restore populations. 2022: Soylent Green is People! The Seven Blunders of the World (Mohandas Gandhi) Wealth w/o work Pleasure w/o conscience Knowledge w/o character Commerce w/o morality Science w/o humanity Worship w/o sacrifice Politics w/o principle Confidentiality Notice: This e-mail message, including any attachments, is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review, use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended recipient, please contact the sender by reply e-mail and destroy all copies of the original message.
