My 2c on the matter:

1) GPS (Global Positioning System) is a specific set of satellites, from
the US. But there's also GLONASS, from Russia, and others are planned for
the future, such as GALILEO (Europe) and BeiDou-2/COMPASS (China). The
general term for "satellite-based positioning method" is GNSS (Global
Navigation Satellite System). The device you buy at a store is a GPS
receiver (if it only works with the US GPS system), or a GNSS receiver, if
it can access more than one system. I'm not being pedantic, there is
practical relevance to this (below).

2) A good rule of thumb is average accuracies of ~15-30m for phones,
tablets and simple handheld receivers, ~10-15m for better handheld
receivers with good antennas. These use the so called coarse-acquisition
code, at the L1 frequency. GNSS receivers that can combine data from more
than one system (GPS + GLONASS) are very widespread now, and they will
improve these estimates simply by having access to more satellites at any
given time.

If you need sub 10-meter average accuracy, you'll need "survey grade"
receivers that use the L2 carrier frequency (precision code). L2 receiver
prices can vary by 2 orders of magnitude depending on several factors. And
they usually need an external antenna, which costs extra.

If you need sub-meter precision, then you need to use differential GPS
(DGPS), where the surveying receiver is corrected by a second, stationary
receiver (base receiver) that will quantify the expected error during your
survey. There are some subscription services that allow you to use data
from their own network of base stations, instead of your own second
receiver, such as OmniStar (http://www.omnistar.com/). But your receiver
must support these technologies. Many governments also have public base
stations whose data can be accessed, but they might not have bases near you
area of interest. The most important though, is to realize that
"differential GPS" means having more than one receiver (to compare
differences). I've seen several people bummed from not getting the expected
accuracies from their "differential GPS", when they actually have only a
single receiver. DGPS is a method, that requires specific receivers for
using it, but is not a type of device per se. By the way, RTK (Real Time
Kinematic) is a type of DGPS positioning where the correction is done in
real time (as opposed to after the survey, a.k.a post-processing).

3) A cheap way to improve the accuracy of a mobile device is to use an
external GPS, connected to the phone/tablet (or even a PC) via USB or
bluetooth. These units tend to have external/better antennas, which are
important for better accuracy.

4) There has been an explosion in sub-US$1k DGPS receiver chips in the
market now, mostly aimed at the drone market, but they are transitioning
into consumer products as well:
http://store.swiftnav.com/s.nl/it.A/id.4734/.f . These are bare chips, that
could be could be hooked up to a RasperryPi or Arduino if you're into a DYI
solution.Might be an interesting project for an engineering undergrad.

But these chips are enabling cheaper consumer products as well:
http://bad-elf.com/pages/be-gps-3300-detail (I have no affiliation or
previous experience with this specific product).


Cheers,


--
*Thiago Sanna Freire Silva*
Professor Assistente Doutor

Ecosystem Dynamics Observatory
<https://sites.google.com/site/ecosystemobservation/>
Departamento de Geografia
Instituto de Geociências e Ciência Exatas (IGCE)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP)
Rio Claro, SP - Brasil

Google Scholar Citations
<http://scholar.google.ca/citations?user=hpPTEmcAAAAJ>
Currículo Lattes
<http://buscatextual.cnpq.br/buscatextual/visualizacv.do?id=P315543>

On Mon, Apr 4, 2016 at 7:24 PM, Merav Vonshak <merav...@gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi all,
> I would greatly appreciate your input on a handheld GPS device. I’m
> looking for a GPS device that would allow me to navigate to my field sites,
> including uploading plot locations from Google Earth or ArcGIS and viewing
> them in the field, over an aerial photo of the site. I will also need to
> record data points. I’m considering using an iPhone 6 or a Google Nexus 9
> device, wondering about the pros and cons of each options and the app I
> should use in case I choose the iPhone or the Nexus.
> Thank you!
> Merav
>
>

Reply via email to