Dear Colleagues,

I would like to draw your attention, and invite you, to a set of panel discussions titled “Geography of Post Fordism” at the annual meeting of the AAG (Washington, DC) – this is a Human Geography (journal) event. Details and abstract is available below:



Sessions:

Geography of Post Fordism – Capital (session I) -- Thursday, 4/15/10, from 4:40 PM - 6:20 PM in Congressional B, Omni Shoreham.

Chair: Waquar Ahmed

Panelists: Eric S. Sheppard, Gordon L. Clark, Nancy Ettlinger, Geoff Mann, Mazen Labban



Geography of Post Fordism – Class (session II) -- Saturday, 4/17/10, from 10:00 AM - 11:40 AM in Marriott Ballroom Salon 3, Marriott Lobby Level

Chair: Ipsita Chatterjee

Panelists: Raju J. Das, Jamie Peck, Richard Peet, Richard A. Walker, Neil Smith, David Featherstone.



Geography of Post Fordism – Space (session III) -- Saturday, 4/17/10, from 4:40 PM - 6:20 PM in Hoover, Marriott Mezzanine Level

Chair: Richard Peet

Panelists: John R. Allen, Stijn Oosterlynck, David Slater, Elaine Hartwick, Kevin R. Cox, Rupal Oza



Abstract: Decline in the manufacturing sectors in parts of the developed and developing economies and a corresponding decline in the importance of the factory floor as a site for production and capital- labor confrontation is described as a transition to Post-Fordism. The geography of post-Fordism is replete with de-regulation, market liberalization, outsourcing, subcontracting, informalization, leading to what is often described as the post-industrial era. Post-Fordism is often understood as a period of decline of capital-labor confrontation and a corresponding rise of struggles over symbolic and cultural resources, and rights to specificity and difference. Much research in geography today is devoted towards investigating identity, ethnic, and cultural struggles. Space is conceptualized as place versus place competition, spaces of regionalism, re-scalings, flat ontology, glocalization, and capital is understood as foot- loose, global, speculative, and financial. In a series of three sessions, we hope to debate class, space, and capital from Marxist and Post-structuralist positions. Each session will discuss the need, if at all, to re-conceptualize each of the three concepts (capital, space, class) and deliberate how it could be useful to re-imagine class, labor, and class struggles; re-envision space, place, scale, uneven development; and understand accumulation strategies of capital in the context of post-Fordist de-industrailization - this is a panel on Space. The purpose is to glean out conceptual resources that could be intellectually useful for understanding the geography of post- Fordism.


----------------------------------
Waquar Ahmed
Department of Geology and Geography
Mount Holyoke College
50 College Street, South Hadley, MA 01075.
web: http://www.mtholyoke.edu/acad/geography/wahmed.html

Reply via email to