*Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*

CFP for RGS-IBG 2022: Housing Speculations: Conversations about Work in Progress

Convenors: Jessa Loomis (Newcastle University) and Elsa Noterman (University of 
Cambridge)


This ‘work in progress’ session is a dynamic space for critical housing 
scholars to think together about housing from a variety of vantage points, 
conceptual framings and geographies. We welcome brief presentations (5-7 
minutes) that explore a sliver of your thinking-in-progress including early 
theories, unfolding vignettes, dialogues with activists and colleagues, and 
research nuggets that keep you up at night. Seeking to foster an engaged and 
collegial discussion across many housing questions, this session is 
particularly inspired by recent work in urban, legal, and economic geography on 
housing markets, rights, and activism within (racialised) property and 
ownership regimes.


We welcome scholars thinking broadly about housing and property regimes, 
including, but not limited to work exploring:

  *   Financial, legal or technical mechanisms that shape the housing 
landscape, such as appraisal (Zaimi 2020), land contracts (Teresa 2022), 
algorithmic planning (Safransky 2019), and eviction infrastructures (Baker 
2020).

  *   New theoretical or conceptual directions, such as work on dis/possessive 
collectivism (Roy 2017), planning without property (Dorries 2022), speculative 
(counter) cartographies of property (Noterman 2021), the intersections of 
housing justice and decolonization (Ramírez 2020), and ongoing conversations 
about radical housing (Radical Housing Journal).

  *   The ‘story of property’ (Brahinsky 2020) or emergent considerations about 
the impacts of COVID-19 on housing and housing activism (Maalsen, Rogers, & 
Ross 2020).

  *   Novel housing relations such as ibuying corporate landlords (Fields 
2022), housing commons and cooperative projects (Ferreri & Vidal 2021; 
Hodkinson 2012; Thompson 2020), and squatters movements (Martínez 2020).

  *   How land and property are imbricated with systems of racial capitalism, 
settler colonialism and white supremacy (Bhandar 2018; Launius & Boyce, 2021; 
Nichols, 2020) so that we might better understand the role of housing and 
housing financialisation in the racialized accumulation of wealth over time 
(Markley et al., 2020; Fields & Raymond, 2021) and differential relations of 
precarity and houselessness (Blomley 2020; Gillespie, Hardy, & Watts 2021).


Please submit a title and an abstract (up to 250 words) to Jessa Loomis 
(jessa.loo...@newcastle.ac.uk<mailto:jessa.loo...@newcastle.ac.uk>) and Elsa 
Noterman (ea...@cam.ac.uk<mailto:ea...@cam.ac.uk>) by Monday, 14 March 2022. We 
will respond to all submissions by the end of day on 21st March. Given the 
structure of this work in progress session, we are planning to conduct the 
session in-person. However, if circumstances prevent you from joining us in 
Newcastle, please be in touch and we will consider the possibility of hybrid 
participation.


References

Baker, A. (2020). Eviction as infrastructure. City, 24(1-2), 143-150.

Bhandar, B. (2018). Colonial lives of property: Law, land, and racial regimes 
of ownership. Duke University Press.

Blomley N (2020) Precarious law, hosing, and the socio-spatial order. Antipode 
52(1): 36-57.

Brahinsky, R. (2020). The story of property: Meditations on gentrification, 
renaming, and possibility. Environment and Planning A: Economy and Space, 
52(5), 837-855.

Dorries, H. (2022). What is planning without property? Relational practices of 
being and belonging. Environment and Planning D: Society and Space.

Ferreri M & L Vidal (2021) Public-cooperative policy mechanisms for housing 
commons. International Journal of Housing Policy.

Fields, D., & Raymond, E. L. (2021). Racialized geographies of housing 
financialization. Progress in Human Geography.

Fields, D. (2022, January 4). Tech and finance firms buying up homes doesn’t 
bode well for everyone else. Washington Post. 
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.washingtonpost.com%2Foutlook%2F2022%2F01%2F04%2Fcorporate-landlords-silicon-valley%2F&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C3d5b2fe834614a2d8de108da02897d30%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637825086789039680%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=unsrj8gmafAXors3CTD4HGYyMJ90xE7sst0BEmfkedU%3D&amp;reserved=0

Gillespie T, Hardy K, Watt P (2021) Surplus to the city: austerity urbanism, 
displacement and ‘letting die.’ Environment & Planning A: 1-17.

Hodkinson S (2012) The return of the housing question. Ephemera: theory & 
politics in organization 12(4).

Launius, S., & Boyce, G. A. (2021). More than metaphor: Settler colonialism, 
frontier logic, and the continuities of racialized dispossession in a Southwest 
US City. Annals of the American Association of Geographers, 111(1), 157–174.

Maalsen S, Rogers D, LP Ross (2020) Rent and crisis: old housing problems 
require a new state of exception in Australia. Dialogues in Human Geography.

Markley, S. N., Hafley, T. J., Allums, C. A., Holloway, S. R., & Chung, H. C. 
(2020). The limits of homeownership: Racial capitalism, black wealth, and the 
appreciation gap in Atlanta. International Journal of Urban and Regional 
Research, 44(2), 310-328.

Martínez M (2020) Squatters in the Capitalist City: Housing, Justice, and Urban 
Politics. Routledge.

Nichols, R. (2020). Theft is property!: Dispossession and critical theory (p. 
238). Duke University Press.

Noterman E (2022) Speculating on vacancy. Transactions of the Institute of 
British Geographers 41(1).

Ramírez, M. M. (2020). Take the houses back/take the land back: Black and 
Indigenous urban futures in Oakland. Urban Geography, 41(5), 682-693.

Roy, A. (2017). Dis/possessive collectivism: Property and personhood at city’s 
end. Geoforum, 80.

Safransky, S. (2020). Geographies of algorithmic violence: Redlining the smart 
city. International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 44(2), 200-218.

Teresa, B. F. (2022). The reemergence of land contracts in Chicago: Racialized 
class-monopoly rent as a recursive objective in capitalist property markets. 
Geoforum, 130, 35-45.

Thompson M (2020) Reconstructing public housing: Liverpool’s hidden history of 
collective alternatives. Liverpool. Liverpool University Press.

Zaimi, R. (2021). Rethinking “Disinvestment”: Historical geographies of 
predatory property relations on Chicago’s South Side. Environment and Planning 
D: Society and Space.
--
Jessa M. Loomis, PhD
Lecturer in Economic Geography
School of Geography, Politics & Sociology
Newcastle University
Newcastle upon Tyne, NE1 7RU, UK
Henry Daysh Building, Office 3.51
t: @jessaloomis
https://nam10.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.ncl.ac.uk%2Fgps%2Fstaff%2Fprofile%2Fjessaloomis.html&amp;data=04%7C01%7C%7C3d5b2fe834614a2d8de108da02897d30%7C17f1a87e2a254eaab9df9d439034b080%7C0%7C0%7C637825086789039680%7CUnknown%7CTWFpbGZsb3d8eyJWIjoiMC4wLjAwMDAiLCJQIjoiV2luMzIiLCJBTiI6Ik1haWwiLCJXVCI6Mn0%3D%7C3000&amp;sdata=V5NBzuX7efDYRbOZKF9x%2B4EyWVD2bAG%2BBLNm8pAUqAM%3D&amp;reserved=0

Reply via email to