*Message sent from a system outside of UConn.*

CFP AAG 2023: Feminist economic geography and the future(s) of work and social 
reproduction



Tyler Blackman, Lia Frederiksen, Emily Reid-Musson, Daniel Cockayne, Nancy Worth


Feminist economic geographers and other aligned perspectives offer new ways of 
thinking about and understanding futurity and the future of work. These 
perspectives are valuable as they push back on many of the optimistic and 
pessimistic economistic and technocentric understandings of what kinds of 
futures are likely or possible. By foregrounding power and social difference, 
feminist, intersectional, queer, transfeminist, and Marxist approaches are 
especially important for considering the potential range of futures for workers 
and work.



In this session we seek to foreground emerging and in-progress research in 
feminist economic geography that examines work alongside an understanding of 
futurity or the future. We welcome contributions with a focus on work, broadly 
conceived (whether paid or unpaid, formal or informal, waged or salaried, as 
production or as social reproduction, etc.) as well as workplaces, and/or the 
future(s) of work. Topics may include (but are not limited to):

  *   Deregulation and precarization
  *   Re/productive labour divisions, relations, and platforms
  *   Changing relations between employers and employees or contractors
  *   How agency is conceptualized, constrained, and enacted at work
  *   Workplace surveillance and control
  *   Work and diverse economies
  *   Capacities to work from home and the associated change in spatial 
relationships with workplaces and the home
  *   The expansion of care-giving related forms of work
  *   Organizing and secure work
  *   Labour mediation and intermediaries
  *   Digital, on-demand, and other forms of precarious and informal 'sharing 
economy' work
  *   What gets to count as paid and unpaid work, and who gets to decide
  *   Migrant labour and mobilities
  *   The future of work in the context of the COVID-19 pandemic


The format for this hybrid session will be a bit different from other sessions 
at the conference - we are aiming for a more dialogic format focused on 
sharing, receiving feedback, and answering each other's questions.  Papers will 
be no more than 8-10 minutes in length, to leave room for questions, 
discussion, and debate after each paper and at the end of the session. 
Participants are encouraged to share new research ideas and work in progress 
(rather than "finished" or previously published research) and foreground the 
kinds of feedback they'd like to receive.


Send your 200 word abstract to Daniel Cockayne 
daniel.cocka...@uwaterloo.ca<mailto:daniel.cocka...@uwaterloo.ca>, Emily 
Reid-Musson emilyreidmus...@gmail.com<mailto:emilyreidmus...@gmail.com> or 
Nancy Worth nancy.wo...@uwaterloo.ca<mailto:nancy.wo...@uwaterloo.ca>  by 
November 7th.

Reply via email to