> We would be interested in eCosCentric's JFFS2 if - in order of > importance > - it would need less RAM per file > - it would have less "strange" problems > * if I drive JFFS2 to its limits (put it full, use very big files, > put > many small files in 1 directory) it can get corrupted > * our simple FTP server corrupts JFFS2 if you put over 180 files with > a FTP client on PC > * the more you use JFFS2 (add and remove files), the more it trashes > itself, so the more delay all actions have > - it would be faster in opening files (especially in a directory with > over 1000 files) > > Therefore, I want to repeat the warning from Thomas Köller: "Do not use > large JFFS2 file systems if RAM is a scarce resource!" > (http://sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss/2003-10/msg00247.html). > And that is just what we have done..
Hi Jürgen, I think you need to discuss these things with eCosCentric. I don't work for them, I just recommend them because I know they provide very good service. As I said before, they provide a supported version of JFFS2 for eCos. I don't have the time right now to go and fix up the one in the public repository. --Chris -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
