Jonathan Larmour wrote: > Sergei Gavrikov wrote: >> RedBoot(tm) bootstrap and debug environment [ROM] >> Non-certified release, version UNKNOWN - built 12:06:17, Feb 2 2009 >> >> Copyright (C) 2000, 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004 Free Software Foundation, Inc. >> RedBoot is free software, covered by the eCos license, derived from the >> GNU General Public License. You are welcome to change it and/or distribute >> copies of it under certain conditions. Under the license terms, RedBoot's >> source code and full license terms must have been made available to you. >> Redboot comes with ABSOLUTELY NO WARRANTY. >> >> Platform: Olimex LPC-H2294 header board (ARM7TDMI-S) >> RAM: 0x81000000-0x81100000, [0x81005900-0x810e1000] available >> FLASH: 0x80000000-0x803fffff, 8 x 0x2000 blocks, 63 x 0x10000 blocks >> RedBoot> >> >> What do you think? Thank you, > > That seems reasonable, but I'd appreciate wider input first on whether > that's the best order before changing it. > > Jifl
I think it's a good choice; if we _must_ live with the verbose banner, better to keep it associated with the product (RedBoot) and not the platform. -- ------------------------------------------------------------ Gary Thomas | Consulting for the MLB Associates | Embedded world ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
