Simon Kallweit <[email protected]> writes: > Nick Garnett wrote: > > Simon Kallweit <[email protected]> writes: > > > > > >> Nick Garnett wrote: > >> > >>> The "#if 0" is an oversight on my part. When debugging via JTAG I was > >>> having difficulties breaking in to an idle system. Stopping it using > >>> WFI solved this. The #else part is also a consequence of this, so that > >>> code should really be: > >>> > >>> > >> Well that's actually the reason for me to propose a > >> CYGHWR_HAL_CORTEXM_IDLE_SLEEP configuration option. During debugging, > >> wfi is rather troublesome, so I thought it might be a good idea to > >> make it configurable. Or is this too much cruft? > >> > > > > I think it might be too much cruft. > > > > I don't know how other people work but I tend to like > > enabling/disabling debug stuff by editing the source rather than > > messing with the configuration. The latter is often more complicated > > and it takes a lot longer to recompile everything. CVS usually reminds > > me to undo the change before checking in -- except in this case where > > there was no original to diff against, and I forgot about this edit. > > > > Well you're probably right. So let's just clean things up then :)
Yep. I'll do this right now. -- Nick Garnett eCos Kernel Architect eCosCentric Limited http://www.eCosCentric.com The eCos experts Barnwell House, Barnwell Drive, Cambridge, UK. Tel: +44 1223 245571 Registered in England and Wales: Reg No: 4422071 Besuchen Sie uns vom 3.-5.03.09 auf der Embedded World 2009, Stand 11-300 Visit us at Embedded World 2009, Nürnberg, Germany, 3-5 Mar, Stand 11-300 -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
