Looking at hal/arm/arch/current/src/vectors.S in IRQ:
We increment the scheduler lock and decrement it again in interrupt_end.In the case of there being a spurious interrupt, we don't call interrupt_end, and so the scheduler never gets decremented.
Am I missing something here? Andrew Parlane Carallon ltd. -- Before posting, please read the FAQ: http://ecos.sourceware.org/fom/ecos and search the list archive: http://ecos.sourceware.org/ml/ecos-discuss
