On Thu Jan 13, 2011 at 11:15:35PM +0200, Sergey Senozhatsky
<[email protected]> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Recent kernel failed to build due to ecryptfs/main.
> 2 of 3 errors could be fixed with the following patch. The third is:
> we make an assignment `lower_inode = lower_dentry->d_inode;' in
> ecryptfs_get_inode, yet ecryptfs_get_inode knows nothing about lower_dentry.
Thanks - This was mentioned just a little bit ago on LKML by Eric
Dumazet ([BUG] ECRYPT_FS) and Christoph responded with a patch. FWIW,
it doesn't look like the patch below addresses the lower_dentry issue in
ecryptfs_get_inode().
Tyler
>
> ---
>
> fs/ecryptfs/main.c | 4 ++--
> 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> index 9ed4769..5694d65 100644
> --- a/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> +++ b/fs/ecryptfs/main.c
> @@ -141,7 +141,7 @@ int ecryptfs_init_persistent_file(struct dentry
> *ecryptfs_dentry)
> return rc;
> }
>
> -static inode *ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
> +static struct inode *ecryptfs_get_inode(struct inode *lower_inode,
> struct super_block *sb)
> {
> struct inode *inode;
> @@ -202,7 +202,7 @@ int ecryptfs_interpose(struct dentry *lower_dentry,
> struct dentry *dentry,
> {
> struct inode *lower_inode = lower_dentry->d_inode;
> struct inode *inode = ecryptfs_get_inode(lower_inode, sb);
> - if (IS_ERR(inode)
> + if (IS_ERR(inode))
> return PTR_ERR(inode);
> if (flags & ECRYPTFS_INTERPOSE_FLAG_D_ADD)
> d_add(dentry, inode);
>
> --
> To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-kernel" in
> the body of a message to [email protected]
> More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html
> Please read the FAQ at http://www.tux.org/lkml/
>
_______________________________________________
Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel
Post to : [email protected]
Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel
More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
