Hi, It was suggested (URL) that we should look at the phoronix testsuite for testing ecryptfs. Phoronix very nicely automates the installation and running of many benchmarks. It doesn't however appear to have any actual correctness tests. It may be worth it to do periodic tests comparing some tests like fio and dbench (both of which phoronix supports) with and without ecryptfs. However, these sorts of tests would be harder to use since we can't meaningfully run them on VMs.
The posix test suite, AIUI, tests other kernel features like shm, but does not test proper posix file behavior. The LTP testsuite is one we sould look at. The fs testsuite has a set of both fs stress tests (like growfiles) and correctness tests (like inode01). We also could write some testcases of our own. I've started a list of potential tests at http://wiki.ubuntu.com/ecryptfs-tests. Please feel free to add entries. Perhaps at the next UDS we can have a session going over the accumulated list, prioritizing, and setting a definite implementation plan. ("i.e. serge, go code it, based on ltp" :) My own recommendation would be that we start by writing a wrapper which fetches ltp and runs the fs testsuite on ext4 and ecryptfs-on-ext4. I'll happily script that and package the script as ecryptfs-testsuite. Then we can move on to writing some of our own testcases. How does that sound to people? If you feel phoronix testsuite should also be done, then I'd like to hear from someone who can volunteer some bare metal, long term, for repeated tests. thanks, -serge _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel Post to : [email protected] Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~ecryptfs-devel More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
