Encrypted filenames are listed in the project plan, and in the FAQ there
is a example given and a hint that the planned solution at this point is
to have a single key per directory for encrypting the filenames.  I
wonder if anyone could explain in more detail what problem encrypted
filenames are intended to solve?  I'm concerned that this solution is
overly complex when you could use DAC or SELinux permissions to control
access to a directory and then just hide any secret filenames below that
barrier.

thanks
-matt

-------------------------------------------------------------------------
This SF.net email is sponsored by: Microsoft
Defy all challenges. Microsoft(R) Visual Studio 2005.
http://clk.atdmt.com/MRT/go/vse0120000070mrt/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
eCryptfs-users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecryptfs-users

Reply via email to