On Tue, Apr 01, 2008 at 10:07:39PM +0200, Karol Ostrovsky wrote: > The final missing thing is the filename encryption. I hope that is > coming soon.
There is no easy way to do filename encryption in eCryptfs without breaking the per-file key semantics and moving toward something like separate per-mount keys just for encrypting filenames. The filenamecrypto branch in the kernel.org git tree has about 90% of the code necessary to do the job, in case anybody is curious to see roughly how it will be done. It will probably be a couple of months before filename crypto gets higher on my priority queue. Things like fixing public key on 2.6.24 or getting the wrinkles out of eCryptfs on NFS is a bit more urgent right now. > Also, I would be really happy if eCryptFS was usable with sshfs. It is really a matter of making sure it works on FUSE. > Unable to allocate crypto cipher with name [aes]; rc = [-2] What are the contents of /proc/crypto? Mike
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------- Check out the new SourceForge.net Marketplace. It's the best place to buy or sell services for just about anything Open Source. http://ad.doubleclick.net/clk;164216239;13503038;w?http://sf.net/marketplace
_______________________________________________ eCryptfs-users mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ecryptfs-users
