Stephan Nagy wrote:
> Robert Burrell Donkin wrote:
>
> > on the other hand, providing getters for only some (and not all) attributes for
> > some classes would be a bit funny - but providing getters for all attributes
> > with setters for all classes doesn't seem worth the candle to me. comments?
> >
>
> Thats one of the requirements in ecs2 (which should support javabeans so you can
> create different widgets inside your ide of choice ).
cool. mind you i can now see why ecs2 is so much work...
> Feel free togo back in and
> add getters that correspond to the setter methods in the current ecs tree.
i'm quite happy to add a few getters for the common (ie. non-javascript) setters in
org.apache.html.Option into the current tree.
- robert
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
