Russell Gold wrote:
> Stephan Nagy wrote:
> >The testbed stuff now compiles just fine, the 'fix' involved removing the
> >imports for openxml, thats it delete 4 lines of code. TestBed.java is just
> >that 'our' testbed it isn't gauranteed to compile or work at any given
> >moment, thus the name testbed. It does however contain useful examples if
> >you want to look at the source, and take the time to understand what they
> >do. Like jon said this isn't rocket science.
>
> Thank you for your work. I do expect to find ecs very valuable, and hope to
> contribute ASAP. Coming from a world of Extreme Programming, I had come to
> expect regression tests to be constantly working and to detect errors
> automatically, and mistakenly assumed that TestBed.java was such a test.
> Once I understand this stuff, I will probably volunteer to create such a
> test based on JUnit if the active developers would like to adopt that
> practice. I have found it to be one of the fastest ways to learn new code,
> as the test tells you what it expects to find and how it expects to make it
> happen.
>
Sounds good to me.
>
> >Me and Jon both do this in our 'spare' time, and quite honestly only a
> >handful of the users of ecs have contributed anything back to the project.
> >I ( like most other developers I know ) despise creating documentation, and
> >am not apt to do anything that i despise in my 'spare' time. If someone
> >out there wants to pay me to create documentation for ecs I might do it.
> >If someone out there wants to contribute and create a more useful set of
> >documentation we would be happy to add it to the project.
>
> Well, I'm with you on hating to do documentation. If I do find myself
> creating some for my co-workers I will happily contribute it.
>
Thanks, that would be appreciated.
-stephan
--
------------------------------------------------------------
To subscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To unsubscribe: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives and Other: <http://java.apache.org/main/mail.html>
Problems?: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
