I've found the NIST evaluation pages at
http://www.nist.gov/itl/div896/ipsg/eval_guide/section3_6.html#SECTION000600
0000000000000
to be helpful as a starting outline for RFQ's.
Jim Divoky, EC Solutions
----- Original Message -----
From: Dennis Smid <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 28, 2000 6:57 PM
Subject: Translator Comparisons
> In order to refresh our understanding of the capabilities and limitations
> of the current EDI translator/EAI offerings, plaNet is in the process of
> reviewing several current offerings. Judging from comments over the past
> several months several participants of this list service have undertaken
> similar comparisons. We would like to compare notes on the evaluation
> criteria used in such studies, and are willing to share those that we have
> developed. We would also like to exchange observations/impressions about
> the products, but only on a functional basis (that is, exclusive of price
> and licensing strategies). Our interest is on the more robust
> applications, NT or Unix only, current versions only; EDI is an important
> component, but are also looking for many-to-many capability. Any list
> member who is interested in discussing further, please contact me directly
> (that is, outside the list service).
>
> Dennis Smid
> plaNet Consulting
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> =======================================================================
> To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
>
=======================================================================
To signoff the EDI-L list, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To subscribe, mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
