Paul:
All 3 major auto companies are doing something completely
different from each other.
While Ford and Chrysler both use X12, they're very different.
And GM uses UN/EDIFACT, just to be completely different.
Of the three, Chrysler is by far the hardest to comply with on
an on-going basis. The information they provide is hard to
integrate with existing systems, and their time requirements
are difficult to meet. It's almost impossible for a smaller
shop to meet their timetables on a regular basis.
I've worked with all the automotive companies for EDI at one
time or another, so if you have specific questions I can be of
assistance with, please e-mail me off-list and I'll be happy to
help. Automotive EDI is my specialty. That goes for you, too,
Gregory.
John Miller
Miller Associates
Data Integration Consultants
---- On , Wakelam Paul ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) wrote:
> Greetings,
> Are the implementations of Ford and Chrysler similar for the
830 and
> 856 ?
>
> What are the differences ?
> Is it true GM USA no longer uses ANSI for schedules and ASNs ?
> Is the second tier automotive industry in the US standardised
in terms
> of it
> formats ?
>
> rgds Paul
=======================================================================
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
