It was a good article, but aren't they simply discovering what EDI folks
have known all along? It isn't the syntax or the silly VAN versus internet
discussions, its the integration challenges.
If partners can't standardize process and information such as product data,
location codes, entity identifiers, request dates, etc, then automating
messages between them is always going to be hard.
Tim Cronin
Avicon
-----Original Message-----
From: Mike Rawlins
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 8/16/01 8:24 PM
Subject: Re: Rosettanet - followup
Now *that* was a really good, balanced article! I wish we could see
more
like it, and less of the hype going around...
david frenkel wrote:
> Deciphering Rosettanet by Patrick Porter
>
> CIO Insight Magazine July 2001
>
> www.cioinsight.com
>
> Regards,
>
> Dave Frenkel
>
>
=======================================================================
> To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
--
Michael C. Rawlins, Rawlins EC Consulting
www.rawlinsecconsulting.com
=======================================================================
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
=======================================================================
To contact the list owner: mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Archives at http://www.mail-archive.com/edi-l%40listserv.ucop.edu/
