Title: Message
RFC 1149 has been updated:
See;
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc2549.txt
 
Seriously, Any EDI effort worth implementing, should use the most standard, affordable and appropriate methodology available to the partners.
Spreadsheets may not seem like EDI, but they're used a lot more than most people think.  It's actually not hard at all to automate the receipt/processing of spreadsheet data.
 
That said, I wouldn't recommend it unless there were no other alternative.
 
 

Thanks,
Martin Morrison

-----Original Message-----
From: Earl Wertheimer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Friday, April 08, 2005 2:01 PM
To: Lou Bedor; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [EDI-L] EDI Question

Lou

> I suppose that this means that the Bongo Project is probably not EDI
> even though it uses an Internet based protocol.
> For fun see http://eagle.auc.ca/~dreid/
> Of course, maybe I'm incorrect.

If it's data, it's EDI.

Ftp is the defined by RFC 959
http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc959.html

It's a good thing you haven't seen RFC 1149.
http://www.ietf.org/rfc/rfc1149.txt

Have a nice weekend....  go home...  NOW!

Earl Wertheimer
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://www.spe-edi.com



. 
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L




. 
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Access the list online at:  http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L




Yahoo! Groups Links

Reply via email to