Hi,
   Update on this. The phone lines were switched and
it looks like things are working okay (knock on wood). 
Got lucky on this one. Thanks for all the feedback. TS


--- In [email protected], Earl Wertheimer <earlw@...> wrote:
>
> Rachel
> 
> > HL7 is not a transport/enveloping specification. It’s a format and
> > data content for the actual clinical data exchange. Fax is transport. 
> 
> You are being a bit pedantic ;-).
> 
> We all know the difference between faxes and digital data transmission.
> 
> My point was that until there is a secure and simple way for a hospital to 
> send 
> test results to a doctor or a doctor to send consultation requests, etc to 
> other doctors, faxes will never die.
> 
> Until doctors can see the advantage of HL7 and all parties will be able to 
> send 
> and receive HL7 messages, faxes will continue.
> 
> I also install EMR software for doctors and faxing is a huge waste of time.  
> Unfortunately, in many instances, there is no better replacement... yet.
> 
> Pharmacies still require hand-signed prescriptions and Labs still require 
> archaic forms.
> 
> PS: The fax transmission standard also includes the encoding and compression 
> of 
> digital data.  
> 
> 
> 
> > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of 
> > Earl Wertheimer
> > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:59 PM
> > To: David Frenkel; [email protected]
> > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone?
> > 
> >  
> > 
> >   
> > 
> > David
> > 
> > > I was in a large hospital just a couple of years ago and they were
> > > using faxes to communicate business documents between the clinical
> > > areas and purchasing, I doubt that has changed.
> > 
> > Most medical clinics still use faxes to communicate.
> > 
> > Some have switched to HL7, but until someone comes up with a simple and 
> > secure 
> > method to send emails, medical information will continue to be sent by fax.
> > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Skip Stein <skip@... <mailto:skip%40msc-inc.net> >
> > > To: David Frenkel <frenkel@... <mailto:frenkel%40worldnet.att.net> > 
> > > Cc: EDI-L EDI-L <[email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com> 
> > > >; David Frenkel <frenkel@... <mailto:frenkel%40att.net> > 
> > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 12:15 PM
> > > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone?
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > >   
> > > 
> > > Hello David,
> > > 
> > > I don't disagree, but I don't believe many corporations are still at this 
> > > primitive level. True, many do not have decent Internet access and that 
> > > is a shame, but will change over the short term. If a company is still 
> > > using bisync and fax technology, I view that as a tremendous opportunity 
> > > to help them get current, save money and gain market share by increasing 
> > > their ability to compete. Always the consultant.... <grin>!
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > Skip Stein
> > > 
> > > Management Systems Consulting, Inc.
> > > http://www.msc-inc.net
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/skipstein
> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/SkipStein
> > > 
> > > Direct: 407-680-3914
> > > Cell: 407-683-6816
> > > Office: 800-856-3193
> > > Fax: 888-243-1843
> > > 
> > > Friday, May 18, 2012, 1:07:15 PM, you wrote:
> > > 
> > > In this Internet, technology crazed world it is still estimated that 20% 
> > > of the people in the US do not use the Internet so there still is a 
> > > market for old technology. 
> > > 
> > > http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
> > > 
> > > David Frenkel 
> > > 
> > > ________________________________
> > > From: Skip Stein <skip@... <mailto:skip%40msc-inc.net> >
> > > To: Travis Truax <travis.truax@... 
> > > <mailto:travis.truax%40hannascandles.com> > 
> > > Cc: tcstoodt <timstoodt@... <mailto:timstoodt%40comcast.net> >; 
> > > [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com>  
> > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:29 AM
> > > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone?
> > > 
> > > Hello Travis,
> > > 
> > > Fax? Another decades old obsolete technology. People still display 'fax 
> > > numbers' instead of email addresses. Insanity persists. Inefficient, 
> > > obsolete, time consuming and waste of energy and paper (do they still use 
> > > paper?). And companies wonder why they loose money and cut manpower 
> > > instead of making the infrastructure more efficient. Another indicator of 
> > > obsolete thinking in American businesses. What are they teaching in 
> > > colleges these days? Use of stone knives and bear claws?
> > > 
> > > Happy Friday!
> > > 
> > > Cheers,
> > > 
> > > Skip Stein
> > > 
> > > Management Systems Consulting, Inc.
> > > http://www.msc-inc.net
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/skipstein
> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/SkipStein
> > > 
> > > Direct: 407-680-3914
> > > Cell: 407-683-6816
> > > Office: 800-856-3193
> > > Fax: 888-243-1843
> > > 
> > > Friday, May 18, 2012, 12:17:40 PM, you wrote:
> > > 
> > > Hi Skip. No idea - He asked the question, I gave him an answer. 
> > > Seems about normal to me. Crappy old stuff just won't die. I'm trying to 
> > > diagnose a faxing problem right now..... 
> > > 
> > > Travis- 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message -----
> > > 
> > > From: "Skip Stein" <skip@... <mailto:skip%40msc-inc.net> > 
> > > To: "Travis Truax" <travis.truax@... 
> > > <mailto:travis.truax%40hannascandles.com> > 
> > > Cc: "tcstoodt" <timstoodt@... <mailto:timstoodt%40comcast.net> >, 
> > > [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com>  
> > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 11:03:15 AM 
> > > Subject: Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? 
> > > 
> > > Re: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? Hello Travis, 
> > > 
> > > Why in the world would anyone attempt to even do this? 20 year old 
> > > technology, while great at the time (I was there!) is so error-prone and 
> > > unreliable, not to mention slower than spit running uphill. Might be fun 
> > > for a school project to show the history of telecommunications and how it 
> > > has changed but in the 'real world'? Not so much. 
> > > 
> > > Cheers, 
> > > 
> > > Skip Stein 
> > > 
> > > Management Systems Consulting, Inc. 
> > > http://www.msc-inc.net 
> > > LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/skipstein 
> > > Twitter: http://twitter.com/SkipStein 
> > > 
> > > Direct: 407-680-3914 
> > > Cell: 407-683-6816 
> > > Office: 800-856-3193 
> > > Fax: 888-243-1843 
> > > 
> > > Friday, May 18, 2012, 9:46:41 AM, you wrote: 
> > > 
> > > My first response would have been that this is a really bad idea, but 
> > > it's been so long since we used bisync - I had forgotten how slow a baud 
> > > rate those used. 
> > > Aren't they 4800 or 9600? If it's not going above like 14400, you *may* 
> > > be able to find a solid ATA that will work for you. As long as the ATA is 
> > > connected to the phone switch via a LAN, and nothing remote. Higher (read 
> > > normal) baud rates with modems or faxes in general do not work over VoIP. 
> > > The slower the better your chance of success. It would be really sad if 
> > > you had to slow your bisync down to keep it working. ;) 
> > > 
> > > Travis- 
> > > 
> > > ----- Original Message ----- 
> > > 
> > > From: "tcstoodt" < timstoodt@... <mailto:timstoodt%40comcast.net>  > 
> > > To: [email protected] <mailto:EDI-L%40yahoogroups.com>  
> > > Sent: Friday, May 18, 2012 8:10:15 AM 
> > > Subject: [EDI-L] bisync over a IP based phone? 
> > > 
> > > Hi, 
> > > Would an old bisync modem connection to a van still work if the phone 
> > > line it was using was switched from a landline to an IP phone? 
> > > Has anyone done this? We're converting to AS2 but our phone guys want to 
> > > make this switch right away. Thanks. TS 
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------ 
> > > 
> > > ... 
> > > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: 
> > > <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC> 
> > > 
> > > Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: 
> > > <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed] 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > ------------------------------------
> > > 
> > > ...
> > > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: 
> > > <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> > > 
> > > Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: 
> > > <JOBS> IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> > > signature database 7149 (20120518) __________
> > > 
> > > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > > 
> > > http://www.eset.com
> > > 
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > Earl Wertheimer
> > earlw@... <mailto:earlw%40spe-edi.com> 
> > http://www.spe-edi.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > [Non-text portions of this message have been removed]
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > ------------------------------------
> > 
> > ...
> > Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: 
> > <SALES>, <JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
> > 
> > Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> 
> > IS REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > 
> > __________ Information from ESET NOD32 Antivirus, version of virus 
> > signature database 7158 (20120522) __________
> > 
> > The message was checked by ESET NOD32 Antivirus.
> > 
> > http://www.eset.com
> > 
> > 
> > 
> 
> Earl Wertheimer
> earlw@...
> http://www.spe-edi.com
>




------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to