Can't really comment much on GXS as my knowledge is a bit dated, so I will 
leave those comments to someone else. 
GSW and GIS: If your using GSW your easiest upgrade (specially if you have a 
lot of maps) by far is Sterling Integrator (aka GIS). As you know GSW is an EDI 
specific application that is designed to take any data format and convert it to 
EDI and vice versa. And because it is very specific to EDI and it is a much 
older, time tested product, you will find GSW to be considerably more mature at 
what it does (EDI). SI (aka GIS) is what they call an EAI or "Enterprise 
application integration". An EAI (according to Wikipedia) is "An integration 
framework composed of a collection of technologies and services which form a 
middleware to enable integration of systems and applications across the 
enterprise.", loosely translated you can use an EAI to tie together your 
accounting to your inventory management just as easily as you could receive an 
850 purchase order, translate it and move it into your order management system 
(said Tongue-in-cheek). The upside is that all your GSW maps should port right 
over unless you have some extensive user exits.
Personal Note: I generally liken the comparison between GSW and SI as that 
between a good pickup and a Mach Truck. I can buy a pickup today and start 
hauling stuff from homedepot almost instantly, which is pretty much the same 
with GSW; however, not so simple with the Mach, I still need to outfit it with 
an appropriate trailer and equipment. That said a well appointed Mach can out 
haul a pickup almost 10 to 1, this is also true of a well appointed SI system. 
Also a normal pickup is about 1/3 the size of a setup Mach, which is an ironic 
number because 1/3 just about says everything else you need to know when 
comparing the two.
GSW has about 1/3 the features of SI.GSW is about 1/3 the price of SI .GSW has 
about 1/3 the setup time of SI.GSW takes 1/3 the training time and cost of 
SI.Lastly projects under GSW generally take 1/3 the implementation time of SI.
Final note, if your shopping for a translator and all your planning to do with 
the application is receiving a data file from a trading partner and port it 
over to your accounting system; do yourself and other employees a favor and 
stick to GSW, there are a lot of thing you can do to cleanup and streamline 
your processes. However, if your an IT manager looking to standardize all those 
little applications that run your entire organization onto one standard 
development language and framework, to include all your EDI processes; then SI 
is definitely your baby.
This post is also available to comment on at: 
http://ediassociates.blogspot.com/2013/01/gsw-vs-gissi.html
Enjoy,
Stephen

Thu Jan 24, 2013 2:07 pm (PST) . Posted by:"challa" challa_yogesh_choudharyHi 
TeamCan some one please explain elaborately what are the differences between 
the the following EDI tools: GSW and GIS, & GIS and GXS, & GSW Vs GXS. As we 
are currently using GSW(Gentran Server for Windows) version 5.1, what would be 
the best possible upgrade to this GSW.Thanks in advance.                        
                   

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]



------------------------------------

...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>, 
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>

Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS 
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links

<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/

<*> Your email settings:
    Individual Email | Traditional

<*> To change settings online go to:
    http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
    (Yahoo! ID required)

<*> To change settings via email:
    [email protected] 
    [email protected]

<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
    [email protected]

<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
    http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/

Reply via email to