Hi.
In preparation to our SAP migration I've offered my boss to migrate our
numerous customized and mostly simple per-partner maps into centralized map
driven by partner-based parameters configured within the EDI system (Sterling
Integrator).
My boss was challenging me whether this was within "Best practices of EDI". I
understand this is rather conceptual issue, and question is whether it would be
hard to maintain centralized map (whenever there is a need to change something
for 1 partner, you'd have to retest the data for all of them, I get that :)))
Never the less, if EDI is not ran by consulting shop, and the long term goal is
reducing maintenance and cost - would this approach fall within "Best practices
of EDI" and would there be any documentation out there to support it, other
then exchange of opinions of EDI gurus on this mailing list?
Yeah, and I wana fries with that!
Happy Friday!
:))))
Thanks!
Ilia.
------------------------------------
...
Please use the following Message Identifiers as your subject prefix: <SALES>,
<JOBS>, <LIST>, <TECH>, <MISC>, <EVENT>, <OFF-TOPIC>
Job postings are welcome, but for job postings or requests for work: <JOBS> IS
REQUIRED in the subject line as a prefix.Yahoo! Groups Links
<*> To visit your group on the web, go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/
<*> Your email settings:
Individual Email | Traditional
<*> To change settings online go to:
http://groups.yahoo.com/group/EDI-L/join
(Yahoo! ID required)
<*> To change settings via email:
[email protected]
[email protected]
<*> To unsubscribe from this group, send an email to:
[email protected]
<*> Your use of Yahoo! Groups is subject to:
http://docs.yahoo.com/info/terms/
