Sounds like a bug to me.
Thanks,
Andrew
On Dec 3, 2012, at 3:00 PM, [email protected] wrote:
> Hi all,
> I have some binary-only drivers with dependency expressions that are not
> being processed. These drivers are not UEFI model drivers.
>
> I see in WorkspaceDatabase.py:
> # If the module has only Binaries and no Sources, then ignore [Depex]
> if self.Sources == None or self.Sources == []:
> if self.Binaries != None and self.Binaries != []:
> return self._Depex
> The intent being obvious from the comment (comes from SVN revision 2135 of
> edk2-buildtools repo). My question is, why are the [Depex] sections ignored
> from INFs with only binaries? I don’t see in any of the EDKII documentation
> where this is stated. Is this a behavior that could be changed?
>
>
> --
> Justin Johnson
> Platform Software Engineer
> Dell, Inc.
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
> Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
> Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
> Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
> http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d_______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
LogMeIn Rescue: Anywhere, Anytime Remote support for IT. Free Trial
Remotely access PCs and mobile devices and provide instant support
Improve your efficiency, and focus on delivering more value-add services
Discover what IT Professionals Know. Rescue delivers
http://p.sf.net/sfu/logmein_12329d2d
_______________________________________________
edk2-buildtools-devel mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-buildtools-devel
