Hi Liming
Can we use SmmIsBufferOutsideSmmValid() in SmmMemLib? 
Then we can remove IsAddressValid() completely.

Thank you
Yao Jiewen

-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of Liming 
Gao
Sent: Wednesday, December 16, 2015 6:18 PM
To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org
Subject: [edk2] [Patch 3/3] EdkCompatibilityPkg: Fix GCC error to avoid the 
duplicated global variables

SmmBaseHelper uses the same name global variables to the one in 
SmmMemoryAllocateLib. Update SmmBaseHelper to use the specific one.

Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Liming Gao <liming....@intel.com>
---
 .../Compatibility/SmmBaseHelper/SmmBaseHelper.c          | 16 ++++++++--------
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)

diff --git a/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Compatibility/SmmBaseHelper/SmmBaseHelper.c 
b/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Compatibility/SmmBaseHelper/SmmBaseHelper.c
index 1d16449..41010f4 100644
--- a/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Compatibility/SmmBaseHelper/SmmBaseHelper.c
+++ b/EdkCompatibilityPkg/Compatibility/SmmBaseHelper/SmmBaseHelper.c
@@ -122,8 +122,8 @@ SPIN_LOCK                          mPFLock;
 UINT64                             mPhyMask;
 VOID                               *mOriginalHandler;
 EFI_SMM_CPU_SAVE_STATE             *mShadowSaveState;
-EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR               *mSmramRanges;
-UINTN                              mSmramRangeCount;
+EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR               *mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges;
+UINTN                              mSmmBaseHelperSmramRangeCount;
 
 LIST_ENTRY mCallbackInfoListHead = INITIALIZE_LIST_HEAD_VARIABLE 
(mCallbackInfoListHead);
 
@@ -760,9 +760,9 @@ IsAddressInSmram (
 {
   UINTN  Index;
 
-  for (Index = 0; Index < mSmramRangeCount; Index ++) {
-    if (((Buffer >= mSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart) && (Buffer < 
mSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart + mSmramRanges[Index].PhysicalSize)) ||
-        ((mSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart >= Buffer) && 
(mSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart < Buffer + Length))) {
+  for (Index = 0; Index < mSmmBaseHelperSmramRangeCount; Index ++) {
+    if (((Buffer >= mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart) && (Buffer < 
mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart + 
mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges[Index].PhysicalSize)) ||
+        ((mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart >= Buffer) && 
+ (mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges[Index].CpuStart < Buffer + Length))) {
       return TRUE;
     }
   }
@@ -1266,14 +1266,14 @@ SmmBaseHelperMain (
   Status = gSmst->SmmAllocatePool (
                     EfiRuntimeServicesData,
                     Size,
-                    (VOID **)&mSmramRanges
+                    (VOID **)&mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges
                     );
   ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
 
-  Status = SmmAccess->GetCapabilities (SmmAccess, &Size, mSmramRanges);
+  Status = SmmAccess->GetCapabilities (SmmAccess, &Size, 
+ mSmmBaseHelperSmramRanges);
   ASSERT_EFI_ERROR (Status);
 
-  mSmramRangeCount = Size / sizeof (EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR);
+  mSmmBaseHelperSmramRangeCount = Size / sizeof (EFI_SMRAM_DESCRIPTOR);
 
   //
   // Register SMM Ready To Lock Protocol notification
--
1.9.5.msysgit.0

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to