On 21 March 2016 at 16:43, Cohen, Eugene <eug...@hp.com> wrote:
>> Although I see why you defined a macro for saving exception context
>> (avoiding duplication) I'm not sure if this is a good idea.  I'm envisioning
>> stepping through the exception handling with a debugger and the resulting
>> confusion because of the code hiding behind the macro.  My preference
>> would be to tolerate the duplication (it's just 5 lines of assembly) in 
>> favor of
>> readability / debuggability.
>
> Ha, I spoke too soon!  Patch 7 increases the duplication of non-macroizing 
> the exception handler this to something like 25 lines of assembly so I agree 
> that the macro is a better approach.  If only you created the patches in the 
> reverse order... :)
>
> [Note to self: don't hit send on patch feedback until all patches in the 
> series are reviewed.]
>
> Series Reviewed-by: Eugene Cohen <eug...@hp.com>
>

Thanks!
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to