On 08/22/16 08:35, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> If the pci-host-ecam-generic DT node describes a 64-bit MMIO region,
> account for it in the PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE description that we return to
> the generic PciHostBridgeDxe implementation, which will be able to
> allocate BARs from it without any further changes.
> 
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
>  ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPciHostBridgeLib/FdtPciHostBridgeLib.c | 59 
> +++++++++++++-------
>  1 file changed, 38 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)

(1) So this patch will have to be rebased to the IoTranslation change
discussed under patch 2/5,

> diff --git a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPciHostBridgeLib/FdtPciHostBridgeLib.c 
> b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPciHostBridgeLib/FdtPciHostBridgeLib.c
> index 0aff149e8029..74fda4d23fa3 100644
> --- a/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPciHostBridgeLib/FdtPciHostBridgeLib.c
> +++ b/ArmVirtPkg/Library/FdtPciHostBridgeLib/FdtPciHostBridgeLib.c
> @@ -87,9 +87,10 @@ ProcessPciHost (
>    OUT  UINT64    *IoBase,
>    OUT  UINT64    *IoSize,
>    OUT  UINT64    *IoTranslation,
> -  OUT  UINT64    *MmioBase,
> -  OUT  UINT64    *MmioSize,
> -  OUT  UINT64    *MmioTranslation,
> +  OUT  UINT64    *Mmio32Base,
> +  OUT  UINT64    *Mmio32Size,
> +  OUT  UINT64    *Mmio64Base,
> +  OUT  UINT64    *Mmio64Size,
>    OUT  UINT32    *BusMin,
>    OUT  UINT32    *BusMax
>    )
> @@ -101,6 +102,7 @@ ProcessPciHost (
>    UINT32                      Len;
>    UINT32                      RecordIdx;
>    EFI_STATUS                  Status;
> +  UINT64                      MmioTranslation;
>  
>    //
>    // The following output arguments are initialized only in
> @@ -109,8 +111,8 @@ ProcessPciHost (
>    //
>    *IoBase = 0;
>    *IoTranslation = 0;
> -  *MmioBase = 0;
> -  *MmioTranslation = 0;
> +  *Mmio32Base = 0;
> +  *Mmio64Base = MAX_UINT64;
>    *BusMin = 0;
>    *BusMax = 0;
>  
> @@ -120,7 +122,8 @@ ProcessPciHost (
>    // above, they are initialized early.
>    //
>    *IoSize = 0;
> -  *MmioSize = 0;
> +  *Mmio32Size = 0;
> +  *Mmio64Size = 0;

(2) and here the leading comment should be updated -- at the moment it
refers to IoSize and MmioSize.

>  
>    Status = gBS->LocateProtocol (&gFdtClientProtocolGuid, NULL,
>                    (VOID **)&FdtClient);
> @@ -207,26 +210,39 @@ ProcessPciHost (
>        break;
>  
>      case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO32:
> -      *MmioBase = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);
> -      *MmioSize = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);
> -      *MmioTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *MmioBase;
> +      *Mmio32Base = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);
> +      *Mmio32Size = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);
> +      MmioTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *Mmio32Base;
>  
> -      if (*MmioBase > MAX_UINT32 || *MmioSize > MAX_UINT32 ||
> -          *MmioBase + *MmioSize > SIZE_4GB) {
> +      if (*Mmio32Base > MAX_UINT32 || *Mmio32Size > MAX_UINT32 ||
> +          *Mmio32Base + *Mmio32Size > SIZE_4GB) {
>          DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: MMIO32 space invalid\n", __FUNCTION__));
>          return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
>        }
>  
> -      if (*MmioTranslation != 0) {
> +      if (MmioTranslation != 0) {
>          DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: unsupported nonzero MMIO32 translation "
> -          "0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, *MmioTranslation));
> +          "0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, MmioTranslation));
> +        return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
> +      }
> +
> +      break;
> +
> +    case DTB_PCI_HOST_RANGE_MMIO64:
> +      *Mmio64Base = SwapBytes64 (Record->ChildBase);
> +      *Mmio64Size = SwapBytes64 (Record->Size);
> +      MmioTranslation = SwapBytes64 (Record->CpuBase) - *Mmio64Base;
> +
> +      if (MmioTranslation != 0) {
> +        DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: unsupported nonzero MMIO64 translation "
> +          "0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, MmioTranslation));
>          return EFI_UNSUPPORTED;
>        }
>  
>        break;
>      }
>    }
> -  if (*IoSize == 0 || *MmioSize == 0) {
> +  if (*IoSize == 0 || *Mmio32Size == 0) {
>      DEBUG ((EFI_D_ERROR, "%a: %a space empty\n", __FUNCTION__,
>        (*IoSize == 0) ? "IO" : "MMIO32"));
>      return EFI_PROTOCOL_ERROR;
> @@ -239,9 +255,9 @@ ProcessPciHost (
>    ASSERT (PcdGet64 (PcdPciExpressBaseAddress) == ConfigBase);
>  
>    DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO, "%a: Config[0x%Lx+0x%Lx) Bus[0x%x..0x%x] "
> -    "Io[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx Mem[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx\n", __FUNCTION__, 
> ConfigBase,
> -    ConfigSize, *BusMin, *BusMax, *IoBase, *IoSize, *IoTranslation, 
> *MmioBase,
> -    *MmioSize, *MmioTranslation));
> +    "Io[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)@0x%Lx Mem32[0x%Lx+0x%Lx) Mem64[0x%Lx+0x%Lx)\n",
> +    __FUNCTION__, ConfigBase, ConfigSize, *BusMin, *BusMax, *IoBase, *IoSize,
> +    *IoTranslation, *Mmio32Base, *Mmio32Size, *Mmio64Base, *Mmio64Size));
>    return EFI_SUCCESS;
>  }
>  
> @@ -263,7 +279,8 @@ PciHostBridgeGetRootBridges (
>  {
>    PCI_ROOT_BRIDGE     *RootBridge;
>    UINT64              IoBase, IoSize, IoTranslation;
> -  UINT64              Mmio32Base, Mmio32Size, Mmio32Translation;
> +  UINT64              Mmio32Base, Mmio32Size;
> +  UINT64              Mmio64Base, Mmio64Size;
>    UINT32              BusMin, BusMax;
>    EFI_STATUS          Status;
>  
> @@ -275,7 +292,7 @@ PciHostBridgeGetRootBridges (
>    }
>  
>    Status = ProcessPciHost (&IoBase, &IoSize, &IoTranslation, &Mmio32Base,
> -             &Mmio32Size, &Mmio32Translation, &BusMin, &BusMax);
> +             &Mmio32Size, &Mmio64Base, &Mmio64Size, &BusMin, &BusMax);
>    if (EFI_ERROR (Status)) {
>      DEBUG ((EFI_D_INFO,
>        "%a: failed to discover PCI host bridge: %s not present\n",
> @@ -304,8 +321,8 @@ PciHostBridgeGetRootBridges (
>    RootBridge->Io.Limit              = IoBase + IoSize - 1;
>    RootBridge->Mem.Base              = Mmio32Base;
>    RootBridge->Mem.Limit             = Mmio32Base + Mmio32Size - 1;
> -  RootBridge->MemAbove4G.Base       = MAX_UINT64;
> -  RootBridge->MemAbove4G.Limit      = 0;
> +  RootBridge->MemAbove4G.Base       = Mmio64Base;
> +  RootBridge->MemAbove4G.Limit      = Mmio64Base + Mmio64Size - 1;
>  
>    //
>    // No separate ranges for prefetchable and non-prefetchable BARs
> 

With those updates, the patch looks good to me:

Reviewed-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>

Thanks
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to