Thanks! Ok for yonghong. > -----Original Message----- > From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com] > Sent: Friday, September 23, 2016 10:44 AM > To: Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Bruce Cran <br...@cran.org.uk>; > edk2-de...@ml01.01.org > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>; Zhu, Yonghong > <yonghong....@intel.com> > Subject: Re: [edk2] NOOPT OVMF build (or otherwise with optimizations > disabled) > > On 09/22/16 06:52, Gao, Liming wrote: > > Laszlo: > > Yes. GCC tool chain has no NOOPT setting in tools_def.txt. Could you > > help submit one bug in Bugzilla? > > I filed <https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=129>. > > Since all (open?) BaseTools BZs seem to be assigned to Yonghong at the > moment, I followed suit here. If that's not okay, please modify the > Assignee field accordingly. > > Thanks! > Laszlo > > >> -----Original Message----- > >> From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of > >> Laszlo Ersek > >> Sent: Thursday, September 22, 2016 11:41 AM > >> To: Bruce Cran <br...@cran.org.uk>; edk2-de...@ml01.01.org > >> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> > >> Subject: Re: [edk2] NOOPT OVMF build (or otherwise with optimizations > >> disabled) > >> > >> On 09/22/16 05:02, Bruce Cran wrote: > >>> Would it be possible to either have a NOOPT build for OVMF added, or > >>> have the DEBUG build disable optimizations? Personally I'd expect > >>> debug builds in general to disable optimizations to allow easy > >>> source-level debugging, but it seems the decision has been made to > keep > >>> optimizations enabled for EDK2 and have a NOOPT configuration for > >>> debugging? > >> > >> Yes, I seem to recall that DEBUG means optimizations enabled, but debug > >> code (such as DEBUG(), ASSERT(), DEBUG_CODE(...), > ASSERT_EFI_ERROR()) > >> included. Indeed NOOPT seems to be what edk2 assigns generally to the > >> build you'd like. > >> > >> A NOOPT build target for OVMF (and more generally for GCC toolchains I > >> guess?) should be possible, likely even welcome, I believe. If only > >> someone contributed such BaseTools patches. :) > >> > >> ('git grep -e NOOPT --and -e GCC -- BaseTools' returns no hits.) > >> > >> Thanks > >> Laszlo > >> > >> _______________________________________________ > >> edk2-devel mailing list > >> edk2-devel@lists.01.org > >> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
