On 20 March 2017 at 11:09, Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com> wrote:
> UEFI executables that consist of a single read+write+exec PE/COFF section
> trigger this message, but such a binary layout isn't actually an error.
> The image can be launched alright, only image protection cannot be applied
> to it fully.
>
> One example that elicits the message is (some) Linux kernels (with the EFI
> stub of course).
>
> Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> Cc: Feng Tian <feng.t...@intel.com>
> Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com>
> Cc: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com>
> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
> Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Acked-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> ---
> MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c | 4 ++--
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
> b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
> index 7689c794a8ad..699c9a827720 100644
> --- a/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
> +++ b/MdeModulePkg/Core/Dxe/Misc/MemoryProtection.c
> @@ -580,10 +580,10 @@ ProtectUefiImageCommon (
> }
>
> if (ImageRecord->CodeSegmentCount == 0) {
> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!!!!!! ProtectUefiImageCommon -
> CodeSegmentCount is 0 !!!!!!!!\n"));
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_WARN, "!!!!!!!! ProtectUefiImageCommon - CodeSegmentCount
> is 0 !!!!!!!!\n"));
> PdbPointer = PeCoffLoaderGetPdbPointer ((VOID*) (UINTN) ImageAddress);
> if (PdbPointer != NULL) {
> - DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "!!!!!!!! Image - %a !!!!!!!!\n", PdbPointer));
> + DEBUG ((DEBUG_WARN, "!!!!!!!! Image - %a !!!!!!!!\n", PdbPointer));
> }
> goto Finish;
> }
> --
> 2.9.3
>
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
