Hey Star, Thanks for your comment! Sorry, I never submited such a report, could you please point me in the right direction? The only way of contact I found on the site of the UEFI Forum were Administration and Press, both don't sound like the right place to post to. Or Is 'Administration' specification administration rather than forum administration?
Regarding 'IN': Correct me if I'm wrong, but in contrast to just 'OUT' parameters, which are 'blindly' written to, 'Attributes' must be checked against NULL first before attempting a dereference. Is this not the correct usage of IN? Is IN only used, when the pointer's destination is read? Thanks again! Regards, Marvin. > -----Original Message----- > From: Zeng, Star [mailto:star.z...@intel.com] > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 10:25 AM > To: Marvin H?user <marvin.haeu...@outlook.com>; edk2- > de...@lists.01.org > Cc: Zeng, Star <star.z...@intel.com> > Subject: RE: [UEFI PI 1.6/EDK2] Missing decorators for > EFI_PEI_GET_VARIABLE2. > > Marvin, > > I think you are right about the statement of decorator 'OPTIONAL', you can > submit PI ECR, then it can be aligned with UEFI EFI_GET_VARIABLE. > typedef > EFI_STATUS > (EFIAPI *EFI_GET_VARIABLE)( > IN CHAR16 *VariableName, > IN EFI_GUID *VendorGuid, > OUT UINT32 *Attributes, OPTIONAL > IN OUT UINTN *DataSize, > OUT VOID *Data OPTIONAL > ); > > And since the passed-in state of the referenced data is not used by the > routine, I don't think decorator 'IN' should be added. > > > > Thanks, > Star > -----Original Message----- > From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf Of > Marvin H?user > Sent: Tuesday, July 25, 2017 12:42 AM > To: edk2-devel@lists.01.org > Subject: [edk2] [UEFI PI 1.6/EDK2] Missing decorators for > EFI_PEI_GET_VARIABLE2. > > Dear developers, > > I noticed that EFI_PEI_GET_VARIABLE2 is lacking decorators in both the UEFI > PI 1.6 specification and the EDK2 codebase. The parameter description for > 'Attributes' starts with 'If non-NULL', hence it may be NULL, which is not > reflected in the function prototype with the decorator 'OPTIONAL'. > Furthermore, as the possibility of it being NULL is not coupled to the values > of the other parameters, 'IN' should be added as well. > > Can someone please forward this to the right working group? > > Thanks and best regards, > Marvin. > _______________________________________________ > edk2-devel mailing list > edk2-devel@lists.01.org > https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
