On 29 August 2017 at 20:26, Alan Ott <a...@softiron.com> wrote: > On 08/29/2017 12:27 PM, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: >> >> Use the proposed BaseTools support for device tree compilation to >> build the device tree binary from source at build time. Give it its >> own .inf and a build rule so the tools take care of everything. >> >> Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1 >> Signed-off-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> >> --- >> Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/FdtBlob/styx-overdrive.dtb >> | Bin 9357 -> 0 bytes >> Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/FdtBlob/styx-overdrive.dts >> | 510 -------------------- >> Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/OverdriveBoard.dsc >> | 1 + >> Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/OverdriveBoard.fdf >> | 9 +- >> >> Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/OverdriveBoardDeviceTree/OverdriveBoardDeviceTree.dts >> | 487 +++++++++++++++++++ >> >> Platform/AMD/OverdriveBoard/OverdriveBoardDeviceTree/OverdriveBoardDeviceTree.inf >> | 28 ++ >> 6 files changed, 521 insertions(+), 514 deletions(-) > > > I like this in principle, but what's the 23 line difference in the DTS > and/or should it be in a separate patch from the patch that moves the file > so the difference is clear? >
Yeah, fair point. Once the upstream prerequisite patch is merged, I will split this into 2 or 3 patches. _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
