Add the comments to address security problems in the Pkcs7Verify Protocol
per UEFI 2.7 updates.

The Pkcs7Verifier function VerifySignature() has problematic use cases
where it might be used to unwittingly bypass security checks.  The specific
problem is that if the supplied hash is a different algorithm from the
blacklist hash, the hash will be approved even if it should have been
denied. The added comments place a strong warning about the problem.
It is possible to use the protocol reliably, either by agreeing a hash to
use for all time (like sha256) or by looping over all supported hashes when
using the protocol.

Cc: Chao Zhang <chao.b.zh...@intel.com>
Cc: James Bottomley <james.bottom...@hansenpartnership.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.0
Signed-off-by: Qin Long <qin.l...@intel.com>
---
 MdePkg/Include/Protocol/Pkcs7Verify.h                   | 10 +++++++++-
 SecurityPkg/Pkcs7Verify/Pkcs7VerifyDxe/Pkcs7VerifyDxe.c |  8 ++++++++
 2 files changed, 17 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/Pkcs7Verify.h 
b/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/Pkcs7Verify.h
index ca5ec75910..eaeda48300 100644
--- a/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/Pkcs7Verify.h
+++ b/MdePkg/Include/Protocol/Pkcs7Verify.h
@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@
   PKCS#7 is a general-purpose cryptographic standard (defined by RFC2315,
   available at http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc2315).
 
-Copyright (c) 2015, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
+Copyright (c) 2015 - 2017, Intel Corporation. All rights reserved.<BR>
 This program and the accompanying materials are licensed and made available 
under
 the terms and conditions of the BSD License that accompanies this distribution.
 The full text of the license may be found at
@@ -140,6 +140,14 @@ EFI_STATUS
   verifies the signature of the content is valid and signing certificate was 
not revoked
   and is contained within a list of trusted signers.
 
+  Note: because this function uses hashes and the specification contains a 
variety of
+        hash choices, you should be aware that the check against the RevokedDb 
list
+        will improperly succeed if the signature is revoked using a different 
hash
+        algorithm.  For this reason, you should either cycle through all UEFI 
supported
+        hashes to see if one is forbidden, or rely on a single hash choice 
only if the
+        UEFI signature authority only signs and revokes with a single hash (at 
time
+        of writing, this hash choice is SHA256).
+
   @param[in]     This                 Pointer to EFI_PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL 
instance.
   @param[in]     Signature            Points to buffer containing ASN.1 
DER-encoded PKCS
                                       detached signature.
diff --git a/SecurityPkg/Pkcs7Verify/Pkcs7VerifyDxe/Pkcs7VerifyDxe.c 
b/SecurityPkg/Pkcs7Verify/Pkcs7VerifyDxe/Pkcs7VerifyDxe.c
index 0da549a6bd..ac83e6d5c2 100644
--- a/SecurityPkg/Pkcs7Verify/Pkcs7VerifyDxe/Pkcs7VerifyDxe.c
+++ b/SecurityPkg/Pkcs7Verify/Pkcs7VerifyDxe/Pkcs7VerifyDxe.c
@@ -1321,6 +1321,14 @@ _Exit:
   verifies the signature of the content is valid and signing certificate was 
not revoked
   and is contained within a list of trusted signers.
 
+  Note: because this function uses hashes and the specification contains a 
variety of
+        hash choices, you should be aware that the check against the RevokedDb 
list
+        will improperly succeed if the signature is revoked using a different 
hash
+        algorithm.  For this reason, you should either cycle through all UEFI 
supported
+        hashes to see if one is forbidden, or rely on a single hash choice 
only if the
+        UEFI signature authority only signs and revokes with a single hash (at 
time
+        of writing, this hash choice is SHA256).
+
   @param[in]     This                 Pointer to EFI_PKCS7_VERIFY_PROTOCOL 
instance.
   @param[in]     Signature            Points to buffer containing ASN.1 
DER-encoded PKCS
                                       detached signature.
-- 
2.14.1.windows.1

_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to