On Tue, Nov 07, 2017 at 11:25:16AM +0000, Ard Biesheuvel wrote: > >> I'd prefer the name > >> ARM_MEMORY_REGION_ATTRIBUTE_WRITE_BACK_NONSHAREABLE but other than > >> that, this looks sensible to me. Leif? > > > > And the same for NONSECURE, yes. > > With that modification, this sounds like something absolutely required > > in this situation. > > > > Does this scenario have any further implications for runtime use? > > I don't think so. These attributes are only used to select the > attributes UEFI uses for its own mapping, and they should only be used > for non-DRAM, so they shouldn't leak into the UEFI memory map in a way > the OS would be able to notice.
Yes, that makes sense. Just wanted to double-check. / Leif _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel