Sent from a small-screen device

在 2017年11月24日,上午1:19,Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>> 
写道:

On 11/23/17 15:58, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
Laszlo,
A S3 flag PCD was added to optimize boot flow. Let's say,
setting the flag to false is to remove some unnecessary code.
setting to true is also fine.

But in this case, setting S4 flag to false is to add some incompatible code.
It's a bit different.

If you check the two patches to revert the PciBus change, Microsoft gave
their Signed-off.

Of course they did: Windows 10 is a Microsoft OS; they obviously will
not want to break their own OS with firmware changes. :)

Anyway, joking aside, as I said, I *do* want to keep Windows 10 in
working shape. I'm just saying that this should be a platform choice. On
some platforms, the AtaAtapiPassThru EBS handler does not tickle the bug
in Windows 10, so on those platforms, it makes sense to do what the DWG
recommends (and keep the code).

If you strongly disagree with allowing customization for this code, then:

(1) Can you please submit a two part series that reverts the following
patches (in this order):

(a) revert 76fd5a660d704538a1b14a58d03a4eef9682b01c
(b) revert 6fb8ddd36bde45614b0a069528cdc97077835a74

This will keep a good git history, and I'll ACK these reverts.

Thanks for your understanding. I do need to revert the EBS handler, because it 
causes a critical S4 resume failure. I will revert them in your suggested way.

Hopefully, the changes in PciBus could be back in future when the OS code is 
changed.


(2) I'll file a down-stream (Red Hat) Bugzilla to make sure we keep the
EBS handler as it is now (at 8284b1791ea9) when we next rebase to
upstream edk2 (as long as we don't support S4).

Thanks,
Laszlo


/Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: Laszlo Ersek [mailto:ler...@redhat.com]
Sent: Thursday, November 23, 2017 9:08 PM
To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com<mailto:ruiyu...@intel.com>>; Zeng, Star 
<star.z...@intel.com<mailto:star.z...@intel.com>>; edk2-
devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel 
<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>>; Dong, Eric
<eric.d...@intel.com<mailto:eric.d...@intel.com>>; Dann Frazier 
<da...@ubuntu.com<mailto:da...@ubuntu.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/AtaAtapiPassThru: disable only BM-
DMA at ExitBootServices()

On 11/23/17 03:20, Ni, Ruiyu wrote:
I cannot explain precisely why the S4 resume fails.
I can just guess: Windows might have some assumptions on the BM bit.

Can we make this configurable on the platform level somehow?

On one hand, I certainly don't want to break Windows 10, even in case this issue
ultimately turns out to be a Windows 10 bug.

On the other hand, OVMF does not support S4, and disabling BMDMA at
ExitBootServices() in PCI drivers is specifically what the Driver Writers' Guide
recommends. Otherwise pending DMA could corrupt OS memory.

So, for OVMF at least, I'd like to keep the present behavior, but for other
platforms, I don't insist on disabling BMDMA, of course.

We already have a PCD called "PcdAcpiS3Enable" in "MdeModulePkg.dec";
maybe we can introduce "PcdAcpiS4Enable" too.

BTW, has anyone reported this S4 issue to Microsoft? (Personally I'm totally
unable to talk to Microsoft -- no working communication channels seem to be
accessible to me. I hope Intel might fare better.) I wonder what their opinion
would be on the issue.

Thanks,
Laszlo

-----Original Message-----
From: Zeng, Star
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 6:26 PM
To: Ni, Ruiyu <ruiyu...@intel.com<mailto:ruiyu...@intel.com>>; Laszlo Ersek 
<ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>>;
edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel 
<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>>; Dong, Eric
<eric.d...@intel.com<mailto:eric.d...@intel.com>>; Dann Frazier 
<da...@ubuntu.com<mailto:da...@ubuntu.com>>; Zeng, Star
<star.z...@intel.com<mailto:star.z...@intel.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/AtaAtapiPassThru: disable
only BM-DMA at ExitBootServices()

Ray,

You may explain more why Win10 S4 resume fails with only BM disabled,
then Laszlo can know the issue well.


Thanks,
Star
-----Original Message-----
From: Ni, Ruiyu
Sent: Wednesday, November 22, 2017 6:06 PM
To: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>>; edk2-devel-01 
<edk2-
de...@lists.01.org<mailto:de...@lists.01.org>>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel 
<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>>; Dong, Eric
<eric.d...@intel.com<mailto:eric.d...@intel.com>>; Zeng, Star 
<star.z...@intel.com<mailto:star.z...@intel.com>>; Dann Frazier
<da...@ubuntu.com<mailto:da...@ubuntu.com>>
Subject: RE: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/AtaAtapiPassThru: disable
only BM-DMA at ExitBootServices()

Laszlo,
Our QA found Win10 S4 resume fails due to your change.
As you might notice that I just rolled back the BM disabling patches
in PciBus module, I am thinking about maybe you need to rollback the
whole ExitBootServices callback as well to fix the compatibility issue.

Thanks/Ray

-----Original Message-----
From: edk2-devel [mailto:edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org] On Behalf
Of Laszlo Ersek
Sent: Saturday, October 28, 2017 12:10 AM
To: edk2-devel-01 <edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel 
<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>>; Dong, Eric
<eric.d...@intel.com<mailto:eric.d...@intel.com>>; Zeng, Star 
<star.z...@intel.com<mailto:star.z...@intel.com>>; Dann
Frazier <da...@ubuntu.com<mailto:da...@ubuntu.com>>
Subject: Re: [edk2] [PATCH] MdeModulePkg/AtaAtapiPassThru: disable
only BM-DMA at ExitBootServices()

On 10/26/17 17:48, Laszlo Ersek wrote:
Clearing I/O port decoding in the PCI command register at
ExitBootServices() breaks IDE boot in Windows, on QEMU's "pc"
(i440fx) machine type. (AHCI boot on "q35" is unaffected.) Windows
seems repeatedly stuck, apparently waiting for a timeout of sorts.

This is arguably a Windows bug; a native OS driver should not
expect the firmware to leave the PCI command register in any particular
state.

Strictly speaking, we only need to disable BM-DMA at
ExitBootServices(), in order to abort pending transfers to/from
RAM, which is soon to be owned by the OS. BM-DMA is also the only
bit that's explicitly named by the UEFI Driver Writers' Guide, for
clearing at
ExitBootServices().

I've verified that clearing only BM-DMA fixes the isse (boot time)
on i440fx, and does not regress q35/AHCI.

Cc: Aleksei Kovura <alex3...@zoho.com<mailto:alex3...@zoho.com>>
Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>>
Cc: Dann Frazier <da...@ubuntu.com<mailto:da...@ubuntu.com>>
Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com<mailto:eric.d...@intel.com>>
Cc: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com<mailto:star.z...@intel.com>>
Reported-by: Aleksei Kovura <alex3...@zoho.com<mailto:alex3...@zoho.com>>
Reported-by: Dann Frazier <da...@ubuntu.com<mailto:da...@ubuntu.com>>
Reported-by: https://launchpad.net/~cjkrupp
Bisected-by: Dann Frazier <da...@ubuntu.com<mailto:da...@ubuntu.com>>
Bisected-by: https://launchpad.net/~cjkrupp
Suggested-by: Ard Biesheuvel 
<ard.biesheu...@linaro.org<mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>>
Suggested-by: Star Zeng <star.z...@intel.com<mailto:star.z...@intel.com>>
Ref: https://bugs.launchpad.net/ubuntu/+source/edk2/+bug/1725560
Fixes: 6fb8ddd36bde45614b0a069528cdc97077835a74
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com<mailto:ler...@redhat.com>>
---

Notes:
   Repo:   https://github.com/lersek/edk2.git
   Branch: ata_disable_only_bmdma

MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.h | 3 +--
MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.c | 5 ++---
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)

diff --git
a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.h
b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.h
index 8d6eac706c0b..92c5bf2001cd 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.h
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.h
@@ -123,8 +123,7 @@ typedef struct {
  LIST_ENTRY                        NonBlockingTaskList;

  //
-  // For disabling the device (especially Bus Master DMA) at
-  // ExitBootServices().
+  // For disabling Bus Master DMA on the device at ExitBootServices().
  //
  EFI_EVENT                         ExitBootEvent;
} ATA_ATAPI_PASS_THRU_INSTANCE;
diff --git
a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.c
b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.c
index 09064dda18b7..e10e0d4e65f6 100644
--- a/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.c
+++ b/MdeModulePkg/Bus/Ata/AtaAtapiPassThru/AtaAtapiPassThru.c
@@ -480,8 +480,7 @@ InitializeAtaAtapiPassThru (  }

/**
-  Disable the device (especially Bus Master DMA) when exiting the
boot
-  services.
+  Disable Bus Master DMA on the device when exiting the boot services.

  @param[in] Event    Event for which this notification function is being
                      called.
@@ -506,7 +505,7 @@ AtaPassThruExitBootServices (
  PciIo->Attributes (
           PciIo,
           EfiPciIoAttributeOperationDisable,
-           Instance->EnabledPciAttributes,
+           Instance->EnabledPciAttributes &
+ EFI_PCI_IO_ATTRIBUTE_BUS_MASTER,
           NULL
           );
}


Thanks Everyone for the feedback; I fixed the typo pointed out by
Star and pushed the patch as commit 76fd5a660d70.

Cheers
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org<mailto:edk2-devel@lists.01.org>
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel


_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to