Sure. Thanks for the feedback.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Ard Biesheuvel [mailto:ard.biesheu...@linaro.org]
> Sent: Monday, December 04, 2017 9:59 PM
> To: Wang, Jian J <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>; Yao,
> Jiewen <jiewen....@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 07/11] ArmPkg/ArmExceptionLib: Add implementation of
> new API
> 
> On 1 December 2017 at 02:37, Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com> wrote:
> >> v3:
> >>    Newly added
> >
> > This patch add implementation of following new API introduced into
> > CpuExceptionHandlerLib. Since this lib hasn't support Stack Guard
> > and stack switch, the new method just calls original
> > InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers.
> >
> >   EFI_STATUS
> >   EFIAPI
> >   InitializeCpuExceptionHandlersEx (
> >     IN EFI_VECTOR_HANDOFF_INFO            *VectorInfo OPTIONAL,
> >     IN CPU_EXCEPTION_INIT_DATA_EX         *InitDataEx OPTIONAL
> >     );
> >
> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
> > Cc: Jiewen Yao <jiewen....@intel.com>
> > Suggested-by: Ayellet Wolman <ayellet.wol...@intel.com>
> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
> > Signed-off-by: Jian J Wang <jian.j.w...@intel.com>
> > ---
> >  ArmPkg/Library/ArmExceptionLib/ArmExceptionLib.c | 33
> ++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 33 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmExceptionLib/ArmExceptionLib.c
> b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmExceptionLib/ArmExceptionLib.c
> > index e8ea1f159d..9fb4a05845 100644
> > --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmExceptionLib/ArmExceptionLib.c
> > +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmExceptionLib/ArmExceptionLib.c
> > @@ -320,3 +320,36 @@ CommonCExceptionHandler(
> >
> >    DefaultExceptionHandler(ExceptionType, SystemContext);
> >  }
> > +
> > +/**
> > +  Initializes all CPU exceptions entries with optional extra 
> > initializations.
> > +
> > +  By default, this method should include all functionalities implemented by
> > +  InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers(), plus extra initialization works, if 
> > any.
> > +  This is could be done by calling InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers() 
> > directly
> > +  in this method besides the extra works.
> > +
> > +  InitDataEx is optional and its use and content are processor arch 
> > dependent.
> > +  The typical usage of it is to convey resources which have to be reserved
> > +  elsewhere and are necessary for the extra initializations of exception.
> > +
> > +  @param[in]  VectorInfo    Pointer to reserved vector list.
> > +  @param[in]  InitDataEx    Pointer to data optional for extra 
> > initializations
> > +                            of exception.
> > +
> > +  @retval EFI_SUCCESS             The exceptions have been successfully
> > +                                  initialized.
> > +  @retval EFI_INVALID_PARAMETER   VectorInfo or InitDataEx contains
> invalid
> > +                                  content.
> > +
> > +**/
> > +EFI_STATUS
> > +EFIAPI
> > +InitializeCpuExceptionHandlersEx (
> > +  IN EFI_VECTOR_HANDOFF_INFO            *VectorInfo OPTIONAL,
> > +  IN CPU_EXCEPTION_INIT_DATA_EX         *InitDataEx OPTIONAL
> > +  )
> > +{
> > +  return InitializeCpuExceptionHandlers (VectorInfo);
> > +}
> > +
> 
> I would appreciate it if you could clean up the grammar in the comment block.
> 
> Other than that,
> 
> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to