On 12/11/2017 4:16 PM, Song, BinX wrote:
Check and assert invalid RegisterCpuFeature function parameter

Cc: Eric Dong <eric.d...@intel.com>
Cc: Laszlo Ersek <ler...@redhat.com>
Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
Signed-off-by: Bell Song <binx.s...@intel.com>
---
  .../Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h       |  4 ++++
  .../RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c                       | 28 ++++++++++++++++++++++
  2 files changed, 32 insertions(+)

diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h 
b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
index 9331e49..54244cd 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Include/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.h
@@ -72,6 +72,10 @@
  #define CPU_FEATURE_ENERGY_PERFORMANCE_BIAS         (32+10)
  #define CPU_FEATURE_PPIN                            (32+11)
+//
+// When you add new CPU features, please also replace the minor CPU feature
+// with the max CPU feature in the IsFeatureValidCheck() function.
+//
  #define CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE                      (32+12)

  #define CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE_ALL                      BIT27
  #define CPU_FEATURE_AFTER_ALL                       BIT28
diff --git a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c 
b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
index dd6a82b..f75d900 100644
--- a/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
+++ b/UefiCpuPkg/Library/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib/RegisterCpuFeaturesLib.c
@@ -81,6 +81,33 @@ DumpCpuFeature (
  }
/**
+  Determines if the CPU feature is valid.
+
+  @param[in]  Feature        Pointer to CPU feature
+
+  @retval TRUE  The CPU feature is valid.
+  @retval FALSE The CPU feature is invalid.
+**/
+BOOLEAN
+IsFeatureValidCheck (
Can we rename this function name to
"RegisterCpuFeatureLibIsFeatureValid"?


+  IN UINT32        Feature
+  )
+{
+  UINT32      Data;
+
+  Data = Feature;
+  Data &= ~(CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE | CPU_FEATURE_AFTER | CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE_ALL | 
CPU_FEATURE_AFTER_ALL);
+  //
+  // Please replace CPU feature below with the MAX one if have.
Can we just say "CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE" is the MAX feature we support?


+  //
+  if (Data > CPU_FEATURE_PROC_TRACE) {
+    DEBUG ((DEBUG_ERROR, "Invalid CPU feature: 0x%x ", Feature));
+    return FALSE;
+  }
+  return TRUE;
+}
+
+/**
    Determines if the feature bit mask is in dependent CPU feature bit mask 
buffer.
@param[in] FeatureMask Pointer to CPU feature bit mask
@@ -444,6 +471,7 @@ RegisterCpuFeature (
VA_START (Marker, InitializeFunc);
    Feature = VA_ARG (Marker, UINT32);
+  ASSERT (IsFeatureValidCheck(Feature));
    while (Feature != CPU_FEATURE_END) {
      ASSERT ((Feature & (CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE | CPU_FEATURE_AFTER))
                      != (CPU_FEATURE_BEFORE | CPU_FEATURE_AFTER));



--
Thanks,
Ray
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to