On 20 June 2018 at 18:39, Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> wrote:
> On 19 June 2018 at 22:52, Chris Co <christopher...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Just checking if there is anything needed on my end to get this patch merged
>> in.
>>
>
> Well, the patch looks obviously correct, but I just tested it and it
> breaks ArmVirtQemu running in 32-bit mode.
>
> I will investigate
>
OK, I found the issue, it is not a hang but a very long stall. Patch incoming.
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
>>> Sent: Thursday, April 19, 2018 5:30 AM
>>> To: Chris Co <christopher...@microsoft.com>
>>> Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
>>> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib ARM: fix Mva to use idx instead
>>> of table base
>>>
>>> On 16 April 2018 at 21:45, Chris Co <christopher...@microsoft.com> wrote:
>>> > Hi Leif,
>>> >
>>> >> -----Original Message-----
>>> >> From: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
>>> >> Sent: Monday, April 16, 2018 3:44 AM
>>> >> To: Chris Co <christopher...@microsoft.com>
>>> >> Cc: edk2-devel@lists.01.org; Ard Biesheuvel
>>> >> <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
>>> >> Subject: Re: [PATCH] ArmPkg/ArmMmuLib ARM: fix Mva to use idx
>>> instead
>>> >> of table base
>>> >>
>>> >> On Fri, Apr 13, 2018 at 11:43:27PM +0000, Chris Co wrote:
>>> >> > Mva address calculation should use the left-shifted current section
>>> >> > index instead of the left-shifted table base address.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Using the table base address here has the side-effect of
>>> >> > potentially causing an access violation depending on the base address
>>> value.
>>> >> >
>>> >> > Cc: Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org>
>>> >> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
>>> >> > Contributed-under: TianoCore Contribution Agreement 1.1
>>> >> > Signed-off-by: Christopher Co <christopher...@microsoft.com>
>>> >> > ---
>>> >> > ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/Arm/ArmMmuLibCore.c | 2 +-
>>> >> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>> >> >
>>> >> > diff --git a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/Arm/ArmMmuLibCore.c
>>> >> > b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/Arm/ArmMmuLibCore.c
>>> >> > index 774a7ccf59..9bf4ba03fd 100644
>>> >> > --- a/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/Arm/ArmMmuLibCore.c
>>> >> > +++ b/ArmPkg/Library/ArmMmuLib/Arm/ArmMmuLibCore.c
>>> >> > @@ -716,7 +716,7 @@ UpdateSectionEntries (
>>> >> > Descriptor |= EntryValue;
>>> >> >
>>> >> > if (CurrentDescriptor != Descriptor) {
>>> >> > - Mva = (VOID *)(UINTN)(((UINTN)FirstLevelTable) <<
>>> >> TT_DESCRIPTOR_SECTION_BASE_SHIFT);
>>> >> > + Mva = (VOID *)(UINTN)(((UINTN)FirstLevelIdx + i) <<
>>> >> > + TT_DESCRIPTOR_SECTION_BASE_SHIFT);
>>> >>
>>> >> So, this clearly looks like you've found a bug - thanks!
>>> >>
>>> >> But I am a little bit confused about the patch - should this not need
>>> >> to incorporate the descriptor size in some way?
>>> >> I.e. something like
>>> >> Mva = (VOID *)(UINTN)(((UINTN)FirstLevelIdx + (i * sizeof(UINTN)))
>>> >> << TT_DESCRIPTOR_SECTION_BASE_SHIFT);
>>> >> or
>>> >> ... &FirstLevelTable[FirstLevelIndex + i] ...
>>> >>
>>> >> ?
>>> >>
>>> >> Regards,
>>> >>
>>> >> Leif
>>> >>
>>> > I don't think descriptor size is needed here.
>>> >
>>> > My understanding is that Mva is the base address of the current section.
>>> >
>>> > FirstLevelidx is derived by the first section's BaseAddress >> 20.
>>> > The current section index is then (FirstLevelIdx + i), which makes the
>>> > base address of the current section (FirstLeveLidx + i) << 20.
>>> >
>>>
>>> Indeed. 'Index' is a bit misleading here, given that it is the top level
>>> index into
>>> the entire VA space, and so it is congruent with the virtual base address
>>> itself. The use of 'FirstLevelTable' in this context is obviously
>>> incorrect, given
>>> that it refers to the [physical] address of the page tables itself, not to
>>> the
>>> virtual region they describe.
>>>
>>> Reviewed-by: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org>
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
