Apologies for the nudge. I was wondering if anyone had had a chance to ponder this?
Thanks, Hen On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 2:44 PM Henri Yandell <flame...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On Mon, Sep 3, 2018 at 4:08 AM Leif Lindholm <leif.lindh...@linaro.org> > wrote: > >> On Fri, Aug 31, 2018 at 09:30:31PM +0200, Laszlo Ersek wrote: >> > On 08/31/18 01:58, Henri Yandell wrote: >> > > The CLA is missing an ‘or’ in section 3. >> > > >> > > See https://github.com/tianocore/edk2/pull/133/files for an example >> of the >> > > specific text. >> > >> > could you please turn this report into a real patch (if the suggested >> > change is valid)? Technically it's easy enough so I could do it as well, >> > just so we have something to review on the list, but: >> > - I have no idea if the suggested change is valid, >> > - I wasn't around when "Contributions.txt" was originally invented. >> >> Would this require a revision bump to 1.2? >> >> Whether a valid correction or not, it changes the premises under which >> certain organisations have confirmed they are happy to contribute. >> Moreso in my eyes than the change that lead to the bump to 1.1. >> >> / >> Leif > > > Just as my tuppence - it relaxes rather than tightens the conditions, so > it’s not a harmful change for those who did notice that the meaning of the > original Apache ICLA has changed. I postulate that the majority assumed it > had the same meaning as the Apache ICLA and agreed to that instead. > > Hen > > >> _______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.01.org https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
