On 03/25/19 21:02, Kinney, Michael D wrote:
> Hi Laszlo,
> 
> The review of the content based on the edk2-stable201903
> is intended to make sure there are no mistakes on that
> content so I can adjust for the final patch series.  A
> mistake would be applying new license to files that should
> not be updated, or not applying the license to a file that
> should have been updated.  You provided valuable feedback
> on those two points for OvmfPkg in V1.
> 
> I agree it will be simpler if we can guarantee no file
> add/remove commits occur in a window leading up to 
> April 9, 2019.  So it is not a freeze on all content.
> It would be a freeze on commits that add/remove files.

Good point.

> How does a ~1 week of no commits of file add/remove
> starting April 1 sound?  I can produce a V3 on April 2
> for final review by all package maintainers.

That sounds great. I'd be happy to iterate multiple times during that
freeze, if necessary (so v3 wouldn't have to be the final version even);
what matters is that the reviews should converge.

Thus, considering actions on my end regarding the v2 posting, I'll delay
reviewing v2 (or v3 if you post v3 meanwhile) until April 2.

I'm making a note in my calendar, but please do ping me on April 2 --
I'm the one requesting this freeze, so once it starts, I should be as
responsive as possible.

> I would of course rebase the patch series on April 9 and
> also verify that no files were added/removed.

Thank you!
Laszlo
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel

Reply via email to