> -----Original Message-----
> From: edk2-devel <edk2-devel-boun...@lists.01.org> On Behalf Of Laszlo
> Ersek
> Sent: Tuesday, April 2, 2019 4:49 PM
> To: Bi, Dandan <dandan...@intel.com>; edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> Cc: Cetola, Stephano <stephano.cet...@intel.com>; Kinney, Michael D
> <michael.d.kin...@intel.com>; Gao, Liming <liming....@intel.com>; Carsey,
> Jaben <jaben.car...@intel.com>
> Subject: Re: [edk2] [RFC] Plan to delete ShellBinPkg from edk2/master
>
> On 04/02/19 07:38, Bi, Dandan wrote:
> > Hi All,
> >
> > ShellBinPkg is the remaining binary package in Edk2 repo. We plan to
> delete ShellBinPkg from edk2/master, and keep source ShellPkg only in edk2
> repo.
> > Before the deletion, I will update the existing consumers in Edk2 and
> Edk2Platforms to use ShellPkg directly.
> >
> > If you have any concern please raise here before mid-April . If there is no
> concern, I will create patches for this task after mid-April.
> >
> > Bugzilla for this task:
> > https://bugzilla.tianocore.org/show_bug.cgi?id=1675
>
> (adding a few CC's)
>
> I think we should not remove ShellBinPkg without a replacement
> *somehwere*.
>
> A shell binary that is built from a validated edk2 tree, with a set of library
> resolutions and PCD settings that are known to keep platform dependencies
> *out* of the shell binary, is extremely useful.
I understand the concern.
Maybe a "Shell.dsc.inc" provided by ShellPkg which lists all library resolutions
, PCD settings and build options can be included by platform DSC to resolve such
dependency issue.
>
> IIRC, Andrew suggested earlier that we should treat the shell even as an "OS",
> with better compatibility standards than we currently maintain.
>
> I think we should only remove ShellBinPkg if we permanently offer a
> separate download location instead, and we rebuild the shell binary from
> "ShellPkg/ShellPkg.dsc" at every stable tag.
I do not quite understand. All other modules in edk2 repo are source-included by
OvmfPkg and daily commits directly generates new binaries for OvmfPkg.
I do not think we should have a different "binary-generation" model for
shell.
>
> In that case, removing ShellBinPkg would indeed improve the edk2 tree, in
> my opinion.
>
> Thanks,
> Laszlo
> _______________________________________________
> edk2-devel mailing list
> edk2-devel@lists.01.org
> https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
_______________________________________________
edk2-devel mailing list
edk2-devel@lists.01.org
https://lists.01.org/mailman/listinfo/edk2-devel
