On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:38 -0800, Jordan Justen wrote: > On Wed, Jan 9, 2013 at 1:18 PM, David Woodhouse <dw...@infradead.org> > wrote: > > On Wed, 2013-01-09 at 13:11 -0800, Jordan Justen wrote: > >> > + // Clear all but the setup_header > >> > + SetMem (KernelSetup, 0x1f1, 0); > > What about OFFSET_OF rather than 0x1f1?
It's actually defined as 0x1f1, and the struct is built to match. So I think 0x1f1 is probably the better option. > Can you use ZeroMem for these? Done. Git tree with four patches (including the first one updated to use lea/push as discussed) at http://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/edk2.git git://git.infradead.org/users/dwmw2/edk2.git Note that the final patch (the EFI bootstub one) is *not* to be applied yet. It uses flags in the kernel's setup_header which aren't there yet in anything but my own kernel tree (users/dwmw2/efi.git). -- dwmw2
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Master Java SE, Java EE, Eclipse, Spring, Hibernate, JavaScript, jQuery and much more. Keep your Java skills current with LearnJavaNow - 200+ hours of step-by-step video tutorials by Java experts. SALE $49.99 this month only -- learn more at: http://p.sf.net/sfu/learnmore_122612
_______________________________________________ edk2-devel mailing list edk2-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/edk2-devel
